Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Queries Participated

Anonymous   21 November 2019 at 14:22

Adoption

Sir my friend Anandi Sharma has adopted a son ram before ger marriage
later she married Sunil Sharma
now Sunil Sharma adopts a son as he states that Anandi his adopted in her personal status and Ram would not be his son and and Sunil Sharma has adopted a boy Karthik from orphanage in Secunderabad is the option of Karthik valid because under Hindu law if a son is there the parent cannot adopt One more son

aishwarya vucha   04 May 2019 at 21:05

llp

sir in partnership even though a partners share is 30% if losses occur he will be liable 100% and this can extend to personal assets also but in llp if a partners share is 30% since liability is limited it will not be 100% but only 30% but can this 30% extend to his personal assets

Anonymous   26 March 2019 at 18:38

conversion

sir my friend is a hindu at time of her marriage with muslim later she voluntarily embraced islam
now they want divorce which law will govern divorce
muslim law or
special marriage act

Anonymous   23 March 2019 at 23:05

talaq e ahsan

sir a man divorced his wife his wife by talaq ahsan by single talaq can he remarry immediately without waiting for the completion of iddat period

Anonymous   23 March 2019 at 18:48

muslim law

sir 1 can muslim pronounce single talaq and divorce his wife does he need to utter thrice
2 sir is the difference bw talaq ahsan and talaq biddat that former former is single pronouncement later triple
3 can muslim woman claim maintenance after iddat period also
4 if a muslim woman has returned back her iddat amt back to her husband and returned to her home has she waived her right can she claim back again
5 if a husband divorced his wife by uttering single talaq on 12 feb 2016 and divorced and can he remarry again on 25 mar 2016 does he need to wait for completion of iddat of woman then remarry or can he immediately remarry

Anonymous   23 March 2019 at 16:14

single talaq and proposal for remarriage of husband

Faizal Hasan, a charming lad of 17 yrs. is the beloved and only son of Mr. Mustafa Hasan, Corporator and a popular social activist. Faizal Hasan with academic brilliance opted for admission into five years Law Course in Radiant Legal Studies & Research, Nyayapura during 2001-2002.
Ms. Revathy also joined the First year of 5 yrs. LL.B. in the same institute and she hails from a traditional Hindu family, well versed in oratory and debating skills,.
2. Faizal displayed his glorious academic achievements throughout his five years of legal academics, bagged much coveted prizes in various national and international competitions organized by various law universities.
Ms. Revathy brought laurels to her institute as social activist attending to the problems of women, children, specially-abled and hapless destitute and aged people.
3. Faizal Hasan and Revathy got infatuated by each other and decided to work together both in legal profession and life. Parents on both sides refused the proposal of Faizal Hasan and Revathy to get married on the grounds of religion and faith. However, Faizal Hasan and Revathy got married before the District Registrar of Marriages, Nyayapura on 20th. September 2007, with the cooperation and support of their friends and colleagues.
4. Faizal commands Corporate and Company law matters and Revathy in matters of Family Law, law relating to women and children.
5. As things stood thus, parents of Mr. Faizal invited Faizal and Revathy to join their family and stay with them, and accordingly they moved to the house of Mrs. & Mr. Mustafa Hasan during September 2009, and have been living happily.
6. Revathy, being enthralled by the love and affection of her in-laws, voluntarily embraced Islam on 15-10-2012, got her name changed to Mumtaz Hasan. Thereafter, Faizal and Mumtaz are blessed with a son on 6-9-2013.
7. Both Faizal and Revathy@ Mumtaz Hasan have been busy with their roaring practice in their respective fields of law, and Mumtaz became more and more popular and busy with the cases of divorced women, and the children of broken marriages, matters of succession, maintenance rights etc. She became active member in many Women organizations like Saheli, Suraksha, and Swasakti. In view of the nature of work, she became more popular among women of minority communities and backward classes but eventually submitted to the displeasure of male persons of the said communities.
8. Some sections of minority community brought pressure on Mr. Mustafa Hasan to desist Mumtaz from taking cases involving fundamental principles of Islam i.e. divorce, maintenance and property rights etc. Mumtaz was subjected to heavy pressure by her in-laws to abide by the sentiments of minority community. Despite good intentions and kind hearts, the love and affection of Mr. and Mrs. Mustafa Hasan, and Faizal towards Mumtaz had a severe dent on account of severe criticism of prominent minority leaders.
9. Even Faizal also supported his parents, started dictating terms and pressured Mumtaz to withdraw herself from all Women organizations. When Mumtaz clearly explained her intention to continue, Mr. Faizal Hasan uttered Single Talaq on February 12, 2016, and left her to undergo Iddat. He further deposited Iddat maintenance Rs.1,50,000/- in the account of Mumtaz. Mumtaz return back the amount to Faizal and left her matrimonial home along with her son.
10. Subsequently, Faizal�s parents have been persuading him to go for second marriage since he has divorced his wife. Faizal consented to oblige his parents wish to get married and the second marriage is fixed and proposed to be held on 25-03-2016.
11. Having come to know of the trials of Second marriage of Faizal Hasan, Mumtaz aggrieved by the injustice meted out to her, challenged the validity of Talaq pronounced by her husband and also sought for injunction to restrain him from contracting second marriage before the Family Court of Nyayapura. The Family Court of Nyayapura initially granted ad-interim order restraining the proposed marriage of respondent-Faizal. The Family Court finally dismissed the petition filed by Mumtaz after trial.
12. Aggrieved by the order of the Family Court, Mumtaz filed an appeal before the High Court of Nyayapura challenging the validity of talaq pronounced by her husband, and also sought for the legality on the conflict of laws involved in this case.
SIR CAN HE FIX REMARRIAGE NOT COMPLETING THE PERIOD OF IDDAT AND CAN HE DIVORCE BY UTTERING ONLY SINGLE TALAQ

aishwarya vucha   22 March 2019 at 10:48

no mention of interest in promisory note

sir my friend ritu took loan of rs 1 lakh from geeta but in promissory note it is mentioned that ritu shall repay back rs 1 lakh to geeta . SILENT ABOUT INTEREST and no mention of it . now geeta is claiming interest . her contention is there is no express mention that " no interest will be charged " in note so is it deemed that interest payable

Anonymous   10 March 2019 at 20:09

copyright

my aunt runs a coaching institute " future ias " and whatever material is made in the institute by teachers is xeroxed and sold in a nearby xerox shop for low rate . the institute is registered and material is copyright protected . as a result many students instead of coming to institute are taking material cheaply . can my aunt sue the xerox shop for copyright violation and the loss of her students

Anonymous   07 March 2019 at 22:00

company defamation

one of the employees krish of my friends company circulated defamatory statements about a previous employee ram to companys customers now can ram sue the company for defamation or sue krish alone

Anonymous   07 March 2019 at 21:35

insurance

an employee in my company ritu gave her car benz to the reapir . when the repair shop owner has to deliver he gave to unlicensed driver . while he was driving he caused injuries to a third person . now repair shop owner has to compensate the car owner as well as third person but it is also insured can the insurance be made liable to compensate the injured does the car owner ritu need to pay to insurance co or ritu is not liable or is there " no fault liabilty " on ritu or is insurance company has to compensate the injured only on his death or is no fault liability on death or or also injuries or can ins co recover from ritu