Facts Land belonging to the respondent, Bhola Prasad Agrawal, was acquired in accordance with the National Highways Act of 1956 (NHA), and the appropriate authorities issued an order giving compensation in accordance with Section 3G of the NHA. In or ..
Section 14 of SARFAESI ActSection 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (“SARFAESI Act” or “Act”) provides for judicial assistance to creditors in enforcing th ..
Facts In his complaint to the Special Court under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, Dr. R. Radhakrishnan claimed that the department head had accused him of misbehaving with female students and other misdeeds in a letter to the universit ..
Facts Anurag Dubey was charged with violating IPC Sections 147, 148, 149, and 307. The Court had rejected his initial request for bail because a proclamation under Section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code had been issued against him designating him ..
Facts of the case The husband-applicant filed the current application to contest the High Court's decision upholding the Family Court's order and increasing the maintenance payments due by the applicant to the non-applicants, namely the wife ..
According to the Karnataka High Court, when rendering final judgments following the conclusion of a trial, the Magistrate and Sessions Judge should decide whether or not it is necessary to recommend the payment of compensation for the victim of a cri ..
FactsThe Tribunal dismissed the Petitioners' Securitization Application for lack of prosecution. The Petitioners then filed a request to have the same restored. While considering the petitioners' case, the Tribunal placed demands on them, if ..
Facts of the case The respondent and appellant are a married couple with two kids. The appellant moved in with her mother in Nanded as a result of a marriage conflict. The husband claimed that his wife had been cruel to him and his family in his divo ..
Facts of the case The Madras High Court found the accused guilty in this case under Sections 16 and 17 of the Bonded Labor System (Abolition) Act, 1976, overturning the Trial Court's decision of acquittal. It was determined that there is enough p ..
Malvinder Singh and Shivinder Singh, the former promoters of Ranbaxy, were today condemned to 6 months in prison and told to pay a fine of Rs 5000 each within a period of 4 weeks by a Supreme Court panel consisting of Chief Justice U. U. Lalit, Justi ..