WHAT DID THE Court SAY?In Yogesh Upadhyay vs Atlanta Limited, the Supreme Court of India has noted that Section 406 CrPC empowers the courts to transfer cheque cases from one state to another.In a Division Bench of Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justi ..
WHAT DID THE Court SAY? In Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors. v. Krishan Kumar & Ors., the Supreme Court set aside the judgement of the Delhi High Court and held that the land acquisition proceedings related to the present case have not lapsed u ..
WHAT DID THE Court SAY? In Shelly Oberoi and Ors. v. Office of Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, the Supreme Court noted that the nominated members are not allowed to vote in the election of Mayor of Municipal Corporation of Delhi. A Three-Judge Bench of ..
The Supreme Court of India has expressed its disappointment with the decision of National Law University (NLU), Tripura to cancel hundreds of admissions for its current academic session (2022-23) due to 'lack of buildings and faculty'.A Three ..
WHAT DID THE Court SAY? In Pancham Lal Pandey vs Neeraj Kumar Mishra, the Supreme Court reiterated that the provision related to review is not there to go over and determine the correctness of a decision. A Division Bench of Justice V. Ramasubramani ..
WHAT DID THE Court SAY? In Sivankalai v. The State and Ors., the Madras High Court granted bail to a man accused of misbehaving with a woman belonging to the SC/ST community. A Single Judge Bench of Justice G Ilangova observed that although the man& ..
WHAT DID THE Court SAY? In Nripendra Chandra Mahanta v. Smt. Pramila Mahanta, the Calcutta HC directed the District Judge, Cooch Behar to decide the application for alimony filed u/s 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act by a wife in compliance with the direc ..
WHAT DID THE COURT SAY? In Sr. Sephy v. CBI & Ors., the Delhi HC held that the virginity test of Sister Sephy, an accused in the 1992 Sr. Abhaya murder case is unconstitutional. A Single Judge Bench of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma called it to b ..
WHAT DID THE COURT SAY? In Rabi Saha @ Sarkar v. State of West Bengal, the Calcutta HC held that taking off a minor victim's pants when she herself refused to do so would amount to an attempt to commit the offence of rape. A Single Judge Bench o ..
WHAT DID THE Court SAY? In S v. V, the Madras High Court noted that grounds for dissolution of a marriage are of continuing nature which means that a subsequent divorce petition cannot be said to be hit by res judicata. A single judge bench of Justic ..
Member Strength 9,10,874 and growing..
© 2023 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
