Is there any provision or law to cause notice to other party to admit the document executed by him during the course of trial in criminal proceedings, where accused did not choose to enter in to the witness box for confrontation.
Hi all,
One "A" purchased property From "B" through Regtd Agreement of sale cum GPA by paying entire sale consideration,and "B" delivered possession,but unfortunately as "B"'s Link Document was misplaced She could not handed over the same to the "A" at the time of Regisration of AGS cum GPA, and subsequently "A" sold this property to "C" and "C" is in continuous possession ever since the date of purchase of property through his tenant, and "C" also mutated his name in Electricity department and Municipal tax dept, and he also paying the same uptodate without any default, while matter stood thus subsequently all of a sudden "B" suppressing the said fact sold the same property to "D" and handed over him her Link document,but she could not deliver the physical possession to "D" since "C" is in possession of the said property under Regt sale deed which is much prior to the sale deed of "D". Thereafter "D" started threatening "C" that he is going to dispossess him illegally and forcibly if he fails to vacate and hand over the possession to him, whereupon "C" has filed a civil suit for perpetual Injunction and got obtained Interim order that "Respondent shall maintain Statuquo till some date, in mean time "D" with malfide intention went to the electrcity board and bribed them and got cancelled the name of "C" in the current month bill, and made them to issue bill in the Name of "B",and paid the bill amount well in advance and obtained receipt before issuance of bill to "C", and after receipt of Bill By "C" he lodged a complaint explaining all the above facts and the said complaint is pending for cosideration of ADE of elctricity dept. Now My question is mere change in the name of current month bill will effect the case of the "C" filed against "D" and further what other legal actions can be taken against "D" to prevent all his illegal activities to safe guard the property of "C". please answer me as early as possible the matter is very serious, and mean while "D" may try to change "C"'s name in every department and to prevent him to do the same what can be done. please it is urgent
Sir
my criminal complaint was dismissed and accused were aquitted after trial by judicial magistratr I class Narwana(Haryana)Now i want to file crl appeal against this order whether my crl appeal is maintainable in the court of sessions judge or i have to moved directly before Highcourt. Plz enlighten me. Thanku
can i seek same relief in 2 proceedings, one before consumer forum and the other in civil court. pls let me know if there is bar to seek single relief in 2 different proceedings.
sir
can a arbitration proceeding if not attended and proceded ex parte, and execution is filed how it can be challanged and what is the remedy to contest?
sir
can a arbitration proceeding if not attended and proceded ex parte, and execution is filed how it can be challanged and what is the remedy to contest?
I want to know where i could get template of various legal documents like MOU, agrements for sale, builder aggre with land owner for construction of flats ( development aggrem) etc
Respected Seniors:
In a complaint ( Basing on the dishonour of cheque which was issued by the Accused for partpayment of the promissory note debt) U/S 138 and 142 of N.I.Act the list of witnessess who are scribe and Attestor of the promissory note were not mentioned. But the Managers of the Accused Bank and Complainant Bank only were mentioned as List of witnessess.
Now the Complainant was examined as PW-1. He wants to examine the attestor of the promissory note to prove his debt.
What is the option available to the Complainant to examine the attestor.
SIRS,
IN ONE OF MY CASES,ALLEGATION WAS THAT ACCUSED ISSUED ANOTHER PERSON"S CHEQUE TO THE COMPLAINANT IN DISCHARGE OF A DEBT AND HENCE COMMITTED AN OFFENCE OF CHEATING.BUT , COMPLAINT WAS FILED U/S 138 OF NI ACT AND THE TRIAL COURT CONVICTED THE ACCUSED U/S 138 NI ACT.IN THE APPELLATE COURT, MY CONTENTION THAT OFFENCE OF 138 WILL NOT LIE WAS ACCEPTED.BUT THE RESPONDENT ARGUED THAT , EVENIF, 138 WILLNOT LIE, COURT CAN ALTER CHARGE U/S 222(1) OF CRPC FROM, 138 NI ACT TO 420 IPC.
WHETHER ALTERATION OF CHARGE CAN BE DONE AT ANY STAGE ? EVEN AT APPELLATE STAGE ?
PLS ADVISE ME
Evidence Act
Is there any provision or law to cause notice to other party to admit the document executed by him during the course of trial in criminal proceedings, where accused did not choose to enter in to the witness box for confrontation.