Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Non payment of arrears

(Querist) 30 January 2017 This query is : Resolved 
I had been serving with a bank for six years and I resigned from the services in JULY 2016.In Nov 2016 arrears were paid by the bank which was for the service period between 2012 to 2016. Even though I am not at present serving at the bank I am entitled to the arrears since I was working for that period.In the notification bank has already mentioned that people who have resigned would not receive their arrears. Kindly guide how can I proceed legally in this matter to claim the arrears.
Kumar Doab (Expert) 30 January 2017
You have posted that:

"I am entitled to the arrears since I was working for that period."



"In the notification bank has already mentioned that people who have resigned would not receive their arrears.'



Both are conflicting.


Still: By which clause or rule you are eligible.


Moreover the said arrears is from which date to which date?


Are you looking for pro rated payment?

Guest (Expert) 30 January 2017
Arrears on account of what and whether sanctioned during your service period or after resignation?
Ms.Usha Kapoor (Expert) 31 January 2017
Agree with Kumar Doab and Dhingra Ji.
Adv. Yogen Kakade (Expert) 31 January 2017
Rightly guided by the experts.. but why the query posted as students
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 31 January 2017
Seems you are talking of the salary revision arrears w.e.f 01.11.2012.

Have you taken with the Bank for payment in writing.

Which is the Bank?
P. Venu (Expert) 31 January 2017
What is the reason for grant of arrears?
Aparajita Mahendra (Querist) 31 January 2017
The payment is for service revision during the period of nov 2012 to oct 2017.It has been paid 3 months after my resignation. The period of revision includes my period of service that is June 2010 to July 2016.Every officer who worked during this period should be eligible as per their period of service.
Guest (Expert) 01 February 2017
Dear Ms. Aparajita,

You have not replied second part of my query, i.e., whether arrear/ revision was sanctioned during your service period or after your resignation?
Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 01 February 2017
Expert P.S. Dhingra,

10 the bipartite settlement (pay revision) of Bank employees was due from 01.11.2012 was signed in May 2015. Arrears were paid from 01.12.2012.
Guest (Expert) 01 February 2017
Rajendra ji

Thanks for the info. But the querist is silent on my question, while that information was quite important and in his own interest, as he was still in service when the bipartite agreement was signed.

It is not understood, why querists try to seek advice on guess basis without providing the basic necessary information.

If, as per classification of query, she has asked question as a student, she may not be aware of the dates of events.
Guest (Expert) 01 February 2017
Ms. Aparajita,

Solution to the problem should be expected by providing appropriate background of the issue.

You have not yet replied my question. Evidently, as per your profile also, you are a student and don't have any such problem in reality. That is why you do not seem to be aware of the dates of events.

However, if there is even a slight truth in your story and face problem in reality and also has any relation with the info provided by Shri Rajendra K Goyal, you are quite eligible for the arrears, as you were in service of the bank, while tripartite agreement was signed in 2015.

So, at first try to get the problem solved by representing appropriately to the management taking due support of the bank unions. But, if the management still deny your dues, you may approach the competent Administrative Tribunal or court of law.
Kumar Doab (Expert) 01 February 2017
Dear LCI author @Ms. Aparajita Mahendra



Mr. Rajendra K Goyal has been banks and is well versed with such matters and has appraised you with details.


Can guide you further also.
Guest (Expert) 01 February 2017
Mr. Dooba,

The query is of an academic nature posted by a student, which you prefer the most like a learner. So, why you should not take the lead to provide educational guidance to the querist, as based on your own personal experience in service matters, as in your profile, you have clearly stated, "Labor and Service law is fascinating" and you prefer to post at LCI on matters pertaining to Labor and SERVICE, BANKING, etc.?

Kumar Doab (Expert) 01 February 2017
Dangar,



In this thread also I have not posted anything on your post or for you.


Still your incurable itch ( Khoojlee) has brought you to abuse and litter nuisance in this thread also.



My profile and posts are my propriety.

And I will decide.



You suffer and bear your own disorders in your private fiefdom and shout/scream/howl in front of your own mirror.




It would have made some sense, had you offered to supply text books FREE to the author.



You claim that you have been writing text books.


What do you write.................



"Once upon a time there was a crow and crow was thirsty..............."?



Now shut up, leave permanently and don't come back.
Kumar Doab (Expert) 01 February 2017
Dangar,



The query is decided by author and posted by author.


The LCI admin will decide to allow it to be posted or not.



Don't jump to lay a trap on Mr. Yogen Kakade.


Mr. Yogen Kakade, has just posted:" Rightly guided by the experts.. but why the query posted as students"



You are NO ONE to decide any query as academic.



YOU do not want to post ,stay away.


Otherwise also, For years of abuse and nuisance that you have been littering at LCI, you are not part of anything that will entertain anything from you.



Moreover you are not ANYONE and ANYTHING at LCI that can decide anything.



The query is from an employee.


Expert Mr. Rajendra K Goyal has been banks and is well versed with such matters and has appraised you with details.


Can guide author further also.
Kumar Doab (Expert) 01 February 2017
Dangar,


Now shut up, leave permanently and don't come back.
Guest (Expert) 05 February 2017
Mr. Dooba,

You are welcome again with your utter frustration, irritation and abuses.

Thanks for the information and certification that "Expert Mr. Rajendra K Goyal has been banks and is well versed with such matters and has appraised you with details. BUT WHERE WAS THE QUESTION OF DOUBT ABOUT THE CAPABILITY OR EXPERIENCE OF MR. RAJENDRA K GOYAL AND WHY YOU WAS IN DOUBT, WHEN I HAVE NEVER RAISED ANY OBJECTION TO HIS ADVICE?

About your statement, "You are NO ONE to decide any query as academic," if you think the question is not of academic nature, you may better prove that the querist has any such problem in reality.

Your statement is also surprising when you have firmly stated, "The query is from an employee." IF THAT BE, ins upport of your statement, you may prove that she is really an employee of a bank.

POKING OF YOUR NOSE IS NOT UNDERSTOOD ON BEHALF OF THE QUERIST, WHEN SHE HAS NOT APPOINTED YOU AS HER ATTORNEY TO REPRESENT.

You have also stated, "Don't jump to lay a trap on Mr. Yogen Kakade." By the way, what is that trap, which you could see, but Shri Yogen Kakde could not see. IN FACT, YOU WANT TO TAKE SHELTER OF OTHER EXPERTS, WHEN YOU FAIL TO JUSTIFY YOUR OWN STAND.

In fact all these are the symptoms of your having gone berserk.

By the way, WHY YOU ARE AFRAID OF POSTING YOUR REAL NAME, PHOTO AND LOCATION ON YOUR PROFILE AT LCI?

Now, I can only wish you the best to help you spend sleepless night to invent some more abuses for me.

Kumar Doab (Expert) 05 February 2017
Poora Saara Dooba ( P S Dhingra)


(Poora Saara Dooba::: Fullly, Wholly Drowned)



You are neither welcome not invited nor called to post your irritation and frustration, in this thread also.



You are fully unsuccessful in this thread also.



You are fully frustrated in this thread also.


You are fully irritated in this thread also.


You are neither Lawyer, nor your firm that you desperately advertise at LCI is a law firm.



You are instead a liar, and you have lied in this thread also.



No one has abused you.



You have been attacking and abusing and littering fro many years at LCI and your condition has worsened in last 8-10 months.



You have never admitted and I am sure you will not admit in this thread also.
Your trademark slogan is ‘Old habit die Hard’ and you have proved it, today, also.
Your observation has neither been invited nor been solicited nor been appreciated as usual.


Your sole purpose was to intercept and litter nuisance in another thread today.
There is no confusion no misleading in any of the thread; be it this one or the other one.


It is height of your falsehood and you are standing volte faced:::::: as per your own trademark habit::: that you have been calling fellow experts TOUT ( Dallal-Dalla)::: Whereas you were reminded it is you that is claiming to be some Chief Lawyer and TOUT (Dallal-Dalla)) for your firm that you desperately advertise at LCI.
So it is you that has been abusing, and attacking and now are getting befitting response.



Your posts in this thread are also nothing but your trademark Dilatory Tactics, Tamashaa ( your own fond word), to sidetrack and distract.



You cannot demand anything from anyone.
It has been pointed out endless number of times.


For your trademark statement; I have proved:::: At least in this thread also you have not proved anything.




You have earned enough from unsuspecting querist/authors at LCI.



There is NO change in my impression posted in this thread, on query , my post and also about you..



Now leave permanently and and don't come back.


Guest (Expert) 06 February 2017
Mr. Dooba,

You are welcome again with your utter frustration, irritation and abuses, as is revealed from your repeated loud cry, "Now leave permanently and and don't come back."

You are openly abusing me and still claiming, "No one has abused you." YOU HAVE PROVED TO HAVE GONE REALLY BERSERK BY MAKING MOCKERY OF YOURSELF BY YOURSELF ONLY. In that case, nobody is required to even try do so.

You have not come with any proof that the author is really an employee of a bank, as you firmly stated earlier, "The query is from an employee."

THAT CLEARLY PROVES THAT, AS OF HABIT, NEITHER YOU DESIST FROM TELLING BLATANT LIES, NOR FROM MAKING UNCALLED FOR PRESUMPTIONS.

By the way, WHY YOU ARE AFRAID OF POSTING YOUR REAL NAME, PHOTO AND LOCATION ON YOUR PROFILE AT LCI?



You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :