Praivate bus accident&death of my daughter 17 years
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 26 January 2012
This query is : Resolved
NOV 30 2011-A PRAIVATE BUS.SKIDDED OFF AND FELL IN TO A SMALL GORGE.MY 17 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER (PLUS 2 STUDENT) DIED.
CASE IS THAT SOME LEAF OF THIS BUS HAD BROKEN DAYS AGO.IT IS THIS BUS, OWNER AND DRIVER KNOWINGLY SERVICED IN THE ROAD.
THE M.V.I ,IN THE VEHICLE MAHASSAR REPORT,WROTE THAT THE ACCIDENT WAS NOT DUE TO ANY MECHANICAL FAULT.
I MADE PETITION IN THE MAJISTRATE COURT FOR RE-EXAMINATION OF MECHANICAL DEFECTS AND TO STAY THE RELEASE OF BUS
COURT REJECTED PETITION STATING THAT COURT HAS NO POWER TO INTERFERE INTH ENQUIRY STAGE.BUT ASKED POLICE FOR REPORT.
POLICE AGREED TO GET RE EXAMINED
I WENT TO HIGH COURT OF KERALA .STAY ALLOWED FOR TWO WEEKS.BUT EXTENTION REJECTED.
ON RE-EXAMINATION REQUEST OF THE POLICE ANOTHER M.V.I OF THE SAME DEPARTMENT EXAMINED AND WROTE SAME THING
MAJISTRATE COURT ORDERED TO RELEASE THE BUS.
WITH THE RELEASE OF THE BUS NO CHANCE OF RE-EXAMINATION OF MECHANICAL DEFCT
OWNER AND DRIVER ESCAPES.
WHERE IS JUSTICE? WHERE IS LAW?
PLEASE GIV ME ANSWER
Shonee Kapoor
(Expert) 26 January 2012
:-( Sad, but the report has to be taken in consideration by the court.
Regards,
Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 27 January 2012
I do not agree that the driver has been escaped. I think the case might be filed against the driver and the same might be still pending for want of charge0sheet and then charge followed by evidence.
You have ample opportunities to depose your evidence while coming in witness box.
So should file a MACT claim petition now in the given case before Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal of your District and should claim heavy compensation.
Sudhir Kumar, Advocate 
(Expert) 28 January 2012
Whatever be the cause of accident. The liability in MV Act is no fault liability. You need not proe the fault of driver or owner.
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 28 January 2012
Whatever be the cause of accident. you will be paid compensation, by insurance company.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 29 January 2012
THE MATTER POINTED OUT ,I THINK,NEED SOME MORE EXPLANATION
IT IS KNOWINGLY THE OWNER AND DRIVER SERVICED THIS BUS . BUT M.V.I REPORTS THAT “ACCIDENT WAS NOT DUE TO ANY MECHANICAL DEFECT” .THE PURPOSE IS TO PROTECT THE OWNER FROM CRIMINAL OFFENCE .SO THE REAL BACK GROUND OF ACCIDENT ENDS HERE.IT IS BY THIS REASON THE NUMBER OF ACCIDENT LIKE THIS INCREASE ESPECIALLY IN THE STATE OF KERALA WHERE RASH DRIVING AND ATROCITY ON PASSENGERS BY BUS EMPLOYEES IS COMMON . THIS CAUSES THE DEATH OF SO MANY INNOCENT PEOPLE .
MY INTENTION IS TO BRING THIS OWNER AND DRIVER TO BOOK.IT IS WITH THIS PURPOSE I MADE PETITION FOR RE-EXAMINATION OF MECHANICAL DEFECT OF THE VEHICLE . BUT COURTS DO NOT INTERFERE IN THE ENQUIRY STAGE.ON THE OTHER HAND,POLICE DO NOT GO ANY OTHER INQUIRY EXCEPT THE REPORT OF MOTOR VEHICLE DEPARTMENT.POLICE INQUIRY IS NOT MONITORED BY ANY BODY .SO, M.V.I’S REPORT BECOMES FINAL VERDICT AND ETEERNAL TRUTH.
WHAT IS THE REMEDY?
UMMER V
VUMMERV@GMAIL.COM
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 29 January 2012
THE MATTER POINTED OUT ,I THINK,NEED SOME MORE EXPLANATION
IT IS KNOWINGLY THE OWNER AND DRIVER SERVICED THIS BUS . BUT M.V.I REPORTS THAT “ACCIDENT WAS NOT DUE TO ANY MECHANICAL DEFECT” .THE PURPOSE IS TO PROTECT THE OWNER FROM CRIMINAL OFFENCE .SO THE REAL BACK GROUND OF ACCIDENT ENDS HERE.IT IS BY THIS REASON THE NUMBER OF ACCIDENT LIKE THIS INCREASE ESPECIALLY IN THE STATE OF KERALA WHERE RASH DRIVING AND ATROCITY ON PASSENGERS BY BUS EMPLOYEES IS COMMON . THIS CAUSES THE DEATH OF SO MANY INNOCENT PEOPLE .
MY INTENTION IS TO BRING THIS OWNER AND DRIVER TO BOOK.IT IS WITH THIS PURPOSE I MADE PETITION FOR RE-EXAMINATION OF MECHANICAL DEFECT OF THE VEHICLE . BUT COURTS DO NOT INTERFERE IN THE ENQUIRY STAGE.ON THE OTHER HAND,POLICE DO NOT GO ANY OTHER INQUIRY EXCEPT THE REPORT OF MOTOR VEHICLE DEPARTMENT.POLICE INQUIRY IS NOT MONITORED BY ANY BODY .SO, M.V.I’S REPORT BECOMES FINAL VERDICT AND ETEERNAL TRUTH.
WHAT IS THE REMEDY?
UMMER V
VUMMERV@GMAIL.COM
