Anonymous
06 September 2022 at 17:42
If wife has inherited a property and have her name on property card and have died in mysterious circumstances Will her vagabond husband inherit that share after her
Swaty Gupta
06 September 2022 at 10:42
Dear experts,
In a case involving my family property, the opposite party secured favorable judgement by submitting false affidavits and claims. We couldn't prove it otherwise as we couldn't find evidence to counter it. After judgement, we found ample and solid evidence to counter all their lies and to prove that judgement was obtained on basis of lies in court.
What are our options to get the judgement reconsidered and/or to file perjury against the opposite party.
Regards
Vinay Gupta
Venkat
05 September 2022 at 21:28
Dear experts,
I have been fighting for custody of my child for four years in family court and recently won the child custody order in family court in my favour. Child is still with the mother and she was given two months to comply with the order of the family court and handover the child to me. I am sure that she will appeal the decision in high court.
I am in a dilemma and seeking your expert opinion. Some LLB holders (not advocates) have stressed that filing a caveat petition in high court is mandatory for me, because in its absence, high court might almost automatically grant a stay order against the lower court order (in this case, family court). Some others (advocate clerks) told me that filing caveat surely prevents adverse decision against me that would otherwise be given without notice to me, but the adverse decisions are based only on the merits of the appeal and not automatic. Further, that I would always be given the chance to give my version to vacate any stay orders. So, in their opinion, filing caveat is not necessary.
Requesting you to share your valuable advise in this regard. Please note that I do not have an advocate. I have represented the case in family court by myself all these years. I don't plan on having an advocate for the caveat or in high court for the appeal either.
Thank you very much,
Venkat
Anonymous
05 September 2022 at 17:43
There is a govt. security press in Nashik which is central, PSU. We have encashment semi-skilled and un-skilled workers from a conservancy service. Now, contractor is saying that since workers are entitled to 15 days CL and they have not claim their leaves so they are entitled to encash their leaves and if you are ready to reimburse the same then we will raise invoice. I need to ask whether contract workers are entitled to encash CL since nothing is written as such in the agreement. Plz guide.
VKSELECTRONICS VELLORE
05 September 2022 at 17:39
My mother missed parent document of his house As per procedure she logged compliant on police portal 3 month before
til its under process
Where i approached for FIR copy more over NoN-traceable certificate Required for Family settlement?
need guidence
Guru
05 September 2022 at 14:40
Hello sir , can I put the case in court without lawyer . Thank you .
Anonymous
05 September 2022 at 13:38
My father have ancestral undivided 40000 square feet property . Total 5 name mentioned on property (including my father).
Can my father sell his share in property as per Sunni Muslim law without partition?
Anonymous
04 September 2022 at 20:33
A man krishna rao running small shop since 50 years, adjacent to satyanarayana swami temple compound wall, which has been let to him by one Gorongo Goudo and said goudo was died 30 years back. None of the archaka has absolute right and title over the temple, cases run between archaks confirmed the same, lower and senior division courts dismissed their suits stating they do not have any right. Even said temple is not under Endowment Department. One archaka srinivas with crooked mentality colluded with staff of Endowments department, trying to demolish shop of petty vendor Krishna Rao by forcibly evicting him, and to ruine his livelyhood as Krishna Rao is paying rentals to other archaka Pintu.
said archaka Srinivas approached Dist. Legal Services authority, submitted a representation to order for eviction of shop and mentioning the Dist. Collector, Municipal Commision etc., as respondents. Dist.Legal Services Committee orally asking Krishna Rao to vacate the shop. If it happens so, petty vendors family suffer starvation. Â
issue is pending with Dist Legal Services Authority, but the Endowments Department staff threatning the Petty Vendor of disposession and throwing out the goods in the shop.
How said petty vendor can get help by approaching court, can he file a suit for injunction against the endowment authorities and archaka srinivas to restrict their forcible activities. Petty Vendor needs immediate help for survivalÂ
Anonymous
03 September 2022 at 20:58
Respected Members Good evening
Please guide me in the following
A man krishna rao running small shop since 50 years, adjacent to satyanarayana swami temple compound wall, which has been let to him by one Gorongo Goudo and said goudo was died 30 years back.Â
Infact Hanumanth bukta was heridatory trustee of the private temple, archakas appointed by their ancestrals occupied the temple then said Hanumanth bukta filed suit in 1908 for posession inrespect of temple and won the case. subsequently with interference of locals, entered into agreement with archakas gouranga panda and other and handed over the diety and other articles, with an understanding that archaks should return the same whenevery asked by the Hanumanth bukta or his family. after the death of said hanumanth bukta, the family members of archakas settled the temple properties among themselves without any right. later there were cases among the archakas regarding the right over the temple in the year 1998 and 2001 & 2010 and all were dismissed. Lower court found that parties to suits do not have right over the temple, given a direction to Assistant Commissioner Endowments to take over the same. The order of the lower court challenged in appeal and in said appeal the appellate court deleted the part of lower courts order directing the Asst. Endowments Commissiioner "to hand over the posession" has been deleted. Hence the Endowments dept. nothing to do with said temple.Â
As per the understanings between the families of archakas.....four families collecting the rentals of four shops adjacent to compound wall of the temple.
Recently one of the archaka hardly trying to eliminate the others.....gathered some local people, injucted them to widen the main entrance (simhadwara of the temple). So that the shop under the supervision of another archaka can easily be removed. On the other side there was shop under the supervision of said archaka, but with his cunning nature he left the area of his shop, spreaded construction towards the area of the shop under the super vision of another archaka, executed his plan successfully, constructed dwaram with malafied intention.. Colluded with the staff of Endowments Dept. harassing the Petty Vendor.Â
approached Dist.legal Services authority, praying to remove / vacate the shop by submitting a representation mentioning the Municipal commissioner, Dist.Collector and Endowments Dept as respondents, praying to direct the authorities to remove the shop. the same is violative and against to right of living. Repeatedly the Endowments staff harassing the petty shop owner to vacate and threatning that they will evict and throw the goods forcibly. Infact said temple is not under the Endowments Department, but unlawfully interfering in the issue to support the archaka, locked the shop and tried to demolish the structure, who is a forcible man. other departments having careful inquiry kept quite in the issue. Police did not given support to the Petty Vendor, but orally suggested the Endowments staff not to do so without any right.
Devotees are not insisting for widening the existing door, but the crooked mentality archaka pinching some locals in his support and to take legal shelter approached Dist.Legal Services Authority with the help of some of Court Staff.Â
issue is pending with Dist Legal Services Authority
Dist.Legal Services Authority orally asking the petty vendor to vacate the shop without going through facts. Said Petty vendor was feared and disturbed. If he vacates the shop his family will suffer on roads for livelihood.
How said petty vendor can get help by approaching court, can he file a suit for injunction against the endowment authorities and archaka to restrict their forcible activities. Petty Vendor needs immediate help for survival
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Transfer case dismissal
Transfer criminal proceedings case dismiss by high court. My query is since case pertains to woman is there any remedy available. Please reply urgently.