Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

chander shekhar   06 July 2008 at 18:08

LEGALITY OF SIGNATURE VERIFICATION WHILE MAKING PURCHASE THROUGH CREDIT

DEAR ALL

Please tell me whether credit card company who is claiming payment for the unauthorised transations done on lost card charge slips of which have signatures which do not even resemble with mine. is the company right in claming payment against such charge slips. if am i liable to pay the amount for such transations. whether there is any responsibility on the part of the credit card company to verify the signature on the charge slips with that of the credit card holder.

thank you,

CHANDER SHEKHAR

Ambika.S   06 July 2008 at 17:42

motor vehicle accident

whether passenger in the vehicle insured is covered under third party risk?
There is a case wherein the passenger was traveling in Tata Sumo an accident took place and was greviously hurt. The passenger is claiming under the Motor Vehicle Act from the insurer as the said vehilce was insured by a insurance company for third party insurance.

b.sridhar   06 July 2008 at 13:17

merger of authorised share capitals pursuant to a merger

sir,
under companies act,1956 whether the authorized share capital of transferor company can be merged with authorized share capital of transferee company without payment and filling of requisite forms with ROC's.

please clarify

J. P. Shah   04 July 2008 at 19:13

Misuse of securitisation act by bank

Due to misuse and arbitrary use of securitisation act, my friend suffered loss of nearly ten lacs by way of theft by officers of bank during physical custody of flat, damage to furniture as no care was taken by bank for 15 months,depriving wife of her stridhan, though she is not connected to loan, keeping illegal custody of items not charged to the bank,. Now my friend wants to claim damages from bank and its officers. Where should he go-consumer court, civil court or drt?

Manish Singh   30 June 2008 at 11:56

SICA and Companies Act- sec 391-94

Dear Members,
can you please go through these two recent cases and point out whre are the grey areas so that we can use the Delhi HC judgment in our favour.
Please do the needful.

1)Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd Vs AAIFR & Ors.
Decided by the Delhi HC on 11th April, 2008.

2)Tata Motors Ltd. Vs Pharmaceutical Products of India Ltd. and Anr
Decide by the SC on 16th May, 2008.

Sundararajan   29 June 2008 at 23:44

Closely Held Company

Dear Sir,

What is Closely held Co.?

Is there any differece between associate Company and subsidiary Comaany

SAM KOSHY   29 June 2008 at 14:45

Registration of society

We would like to register an eduactional society to impart technical & professional education to the public as well as MOU with govt / pvt sectors.

What are the procedures to register such a society. Please inform us more information & list the procedures.

Regards

SK

naveen mathur   25 June 2008 at 10:51

excise return

Can we revise the excise return after we found some ommission or wrong entry in it? if yes, what is the procedure of revising Excise Return.

atish singh   24 June 2008 at 12:41

takeover of companies

A LTD ACQUIRED 29 % STAKE IN C LTD.C LTD IS A LISTED COMPANY.B LTD ALREADY HOLDS 21 % STAKE IN C LTD.THERE ARE 7 DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY .TWO OF THE ARE REPRESENTATIVE OF B LTD. AND FIVE ARE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. WHAT ARE THE STEPS TO BE TAKEN TO INDUCT THE REPRESENTATIVE OF A LTD INTO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF C LTD.?

jayati   23 June 2008 at 19:02

case against lawyers

lawyers given his report as per avaliable public record in the concerned registry office of the last 13 years. at the time of given his openion that property free from all encumbrances as per search report. borrower can offer mortgage but it is to be suggested to the bank before creation of equatiable mortgage sport varificatipon and enquary must be done by the bank officer.and one affidavit to be taken from the browert the property is not aquired by the Government. but without complaying all the formalities and also not complying the RBI guirdline bank disburse the loan. without taking any action against the borrower , they file one case aginst the lawyerbefore consumer forum allaging his negligence, and he will be liable to pay a sum of Rs. 94,00,000/- as demarage. it is to be mentioned here that he only seen the photocopy of the tittle deed , not the original. original was lying with the bank. in my view bank try to bypass his negligence and startes protracted litigation to save their own negligence. please suggest any judgement/judgements.



Course