Anonymous
17 April 2011 at 11:06
In a complaint case ACMM has ordered for discharge of accused u/s 245 at precharge evidence, but the SPP has filed an cr revision in the session saying that the in complaint case there is no proviosion for discharge. I have one citation(1972) 3 Supreme court cases 282
I need some other citations
Anonymous
14 April 2011 at 12:15
In a complaint case ACMM has ordered for discharge of accused u/s 245 at precharge evidence, but the SPP has filed an cr revision in the session saying that the in complaint case there is no proviosion for discharge.
I have one citation(1972) 3 Supreme Court Cases 282 which says "If charge is found groundless on the face of the record, the accused is entitled for an order of discharge."
I need some other citations ...
Anonymous
14 April 2011 at 00:12
When a summons case is tried as a warrant case and if the accused is discharged under S 245, the discharge will amount to acquittal.
Please quote citation, relevant section or law
Anonymous
13 April 2011 at 09:10
In a complaint case ACMM has ordered for discharge of accused at precharge evidence, but the SPP has filed an cr revision in the session saying that the in complaint case there is no proviosion for discharge.
I have one citation(1972) 3 Supreme Court Cases 282 which says "If charge is found groundless on the face of the record, the accused is entitled for an order of discharge."
I need some other citations ...
Anonymous
10 April 2011 at 23:25
In a complaint case ACMM has discharged an accused at precharge evidence but the SPP has filed an cr revision in the session saying that the in complaint case there is no proviosion for discharge.
I have one citation(1972) 3 Supreme Court Cases 282 which says "If charge is found groundless on the face of the record, the accused is entitled for an order of discharge."
I need some other citations ...
Anonymous
13 August 2010 at 04:55
Pre charge evidence in complaint case under Sec 200 CrPC(PFA). Accused is appearing in person. Complainant/witness during cross examination jumping out of the context to the asked questions has filed fresh documents. No application to submit these documents had been made by him and neither the copy supplied to the accused. There has also been no reference of these documents in compliant or even during cross-examination. Although the accused in this case, has objected to inclusion of these documents at this stage and in this manner, the judge has not written 'objected-to' while admiting these documents. Judge has further exhibited these documents while they ought to be inadmissible. Accused has also filed a application for inadmissibility of these documents.
What are the remedies/options open to the accused ?
Anonymous
12 August 2010 at 21:00
Pre charge evidence in complaint case under Sec 200 CrPC(PFA). Accused is appearing in person. Complainant/witness during cross examination jumping out of the context to the asked question has filed fresh documents. No application to submit these documents had been made by him and neither the copy supplied to the accused. There has also been no reference of these documents in compliant or even during cross-examination. Although the accused in this case, has objected to inclusion of these documents at this stage and in this manner, the judge has not written 'objected-to' while admiting these documents. Judge has further exhibited these documents while they ought to be inadmissible.
What are the remedies/options open to the accused ?
Anonymous
12 August 2010 at 20:55
Pre charge evidence in complaint case under Sec 200 CrPC(PFA). Complainant/witness during cross examination jumping out of the context to the asked question has filed fresh documents. No application to submit these documents had been made by him and neither the copy supplied to the accused. There has also been no reference of these documents in compliant or even during cross-examination. Judge has further exhibited these documents while they ought tobe inadmissible.
What are the options open to the accused
Anonymous
09 August 2010 at 11:26
Pre charge evidence in complaint case under Sec 200 CrPC. Accused is appearing in person. Complainant/witness during cross examination jumping out of the context to the asked question has filed fresh documents. No application to submit these documents had been made by him and neither the copy supplied to the accused. There has also been no reference of these documents in compliant or even during cross-examination. Although the accused in this case, has objected to inclusion of these documents at this stage in this manner, the judge has not written 'objected-to' while admiting these documents. Judge has further exhibited these documents while they ought to be inadmissible.
What are the remedies/options open to the accused.
Member Strength 9,47,858 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
law
When a summons case is tried as a warrant case and if the accused is discharged under S 245, the discharge will amount to acquittal. Please quote citation, relevant section or law