Mistakes in vakalatnama and petition

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 22 May 2022 This query is : Resolved
Respected Experts,

I have a query.
in one of the family dispute a wife has filed a petition against the husband u/s. 125 of CrPC before family court. The title of Document shows Petition No. ______ of 2021(Petition Number is not mentioned anywhere) and the docket shows Affidavit in support of Application Maintenance U/s. 125 of Cr.PC.
further the Application for appoint an advocate is filed properly but the Vakalatnama shows the Petitioner as Respondent No.4.
Dear Expert please guide me that How can I raised an objections against these mistakes in favour of husband.
I am a new one in this field and need your valuable guidance.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

kavksatyanarayana (Expert) 22 May 2022
I think this is only a typographical mistake. You can say to the other party's lawyer that it has to be changed.

Advocate Bhartesh goyal (Expert) 23 May 2022
Such defects are curable defects which can be removed and does not effect adversely on case.

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 23 May 2022
ohk. thank you sirs for your valuable reply.

N.K.Assumi (Expert) 26 May 2022
Never concetrate or focus on trivial matters or you will miss the Heavenly Glory. This is what Bruce Lees said to his student in the movie Enter the Dragon: "When I point out my finger to the Moon, focus your attention to the direction of my finger and not at my finger:."

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Mistakes in vakalatnama and petition

Download LCI APP

Our Network Sites