20(6) res 128 section code of criminal procedure
Priya Yarlagadda
(Querist) 26 September 2017
This query is : Resolved
In DVC case petitioner filed MP under petition filed under 20(6) rws 128 section of Code of criminal, as I had not paid her interim maintenance since last 5 years as there was a stay in HC now petitioner has filed this MP to recover the amount, I had already filed interim maintenance modification petition which got dismissed on the grounds that during the evidence stage judge cannot consider evidence of her working status now I m going for appeal meanwhile they file this MP petition filed under 20(6) rws 128 section of Code of criminal can you help how to counter act or challenge the same till I get an order from my appeal
Few facts:
We had already paid 1/4 of arrears when the court has asked us to pay during allowing ex-party order in arrears, we had not challenged the interim maintenance as we had got stay from HC on all proceeding till 3 years. We had filed an appeal on modification of interim maintenance that we filed as soon as our case was dismissed from HC.
Please suggest how to handle the above petition
P. Venu
(Expert) 27 September 2017
The query lacks clarity.
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 30 September 2017
No material facts available to form an opinion and advise.
However, your lawyer is competent, able and intelligent enough to reply your question(s), consult him/her in good faith.
Donot adventure for a second opinion when you have already engaged a lawyer to contest your case(s) efficiently and effectively.
Guest
(Expert) 21 June 2018
You can handle the case by merely relying on your own lawyer, if he had been able to get such a long stay for 3 years. However, if have any doubt about the ability or sincerity of your lawyer, you may please discuss the same frankly to enable the experts to arrive at some purposeful opinion. Otherwise you may probably not be able to derive any help from the expertise of the experts.
Guest
(Expert) 21 June 2018
You can handle the case by merely relying on your own lawyer, if he had been able to get such a long stay for 3 years. However, if have any doubt about the ability or sincerity of your lawyer, you may please discuss the same frankly to enable the experts to arrive at some purposeful opinion. Otherwise you may probably not be able to derive any help from the expertise of the experts.
Guest
(Expert) 21 June 2018
You can handle the case by merely relying on your own lawyer, if he had been able to get such a long stay for 3 years. However, if have any doubt about the ability or sincerity of your lawyer, you may please discuss the same frankly to enable the experts to arrive at some purposeful opinion. Otherwise you may probably not be able to derive any help from the expertise of the experts.
Guest
(Expert) 21 June 2018
You can handle the case by merely relying on your own lawyer, if he had been able to get such a long stay for 3 years. However, if have any doubt about the ability or sincerity of your lawyer, you may please discuss the same frankly to enable the experts to arrive at some purposeful opinion. Otherwise you may probably not be able to derive any help from the expertise of the experts.
Guest
(Expert) 21 June 2018
You can handle the case by merely relying on your own lawyer, if he had been able to get such a long stay for 3 years. However, if have any doubt about the ability or sincerity of your lawyer, you may please discuss the same frankly to enable the experts to arrive at some purposeful opinion. Otherwise you may probably not be able to derive any help from the expertise of the experts.
