Arising out of SLP (Crl.) 842 of 2006
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 11 April 2011
This query is : Resolved
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1528 OF 2005
Chandran @ Manichan @ Maniyan ... Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala ... Respondent
with
Criminal Appeal No.1530 of 2005
Manikantan @ Kochani ...Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala & Anr. ...Respondents
With
Criminal Appeal No.1531 of 2005
Manoharan ...Appellant
Versus
Kerala State Rep. Public Prosecutor ...Respondent
With
Criminal Appeal No. 1532 of 2005
Vinod Kumar @ Vinod ...Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala ....Respondent
With
Criminal Appeal No. 864 of 2011
[Arising out of SLP (Crl.) 842 of 2006)
Suresh Kumar @ Suresh ...Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala ...Respondent
Question :
1)as we know that there are so many appellant cant we write the name as
Chandran @ Manichan @ Maniyan ,Manikantan @ Kochani ,Manoharan , Vinod Kumar @ Vinod ,Suresh Kumar @ Suresh ...... Appellant &
State of Kerala & Anr. ...... respondent .
2) also what is the meaning of 9Kerala State Rep. Public Prosecutor ) not understood readed & seen this type words first time under the judgment.
3) as it is a criminal appeal why it has mentioned applicnt & respondent ? because it comes under the civil & not under the criminal cases & this is though appeal before the SC so why it has been written not understood ?
4)as we read the brief para on starting of the judgment known as a (Brief)
Brief
All the accused-appellants stood convicted by the Sessions Judge, Kollam by its judgment dated 16.7.2002 for various offences punishable
so that all th accused-appellant stood convicted by the SJ dated 16.7.2002 so why this many number & also on different year
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1528 OF 2005
Criminal Appeal No.1530 of 2005
Criminal Appeal No.1531 of 2005
Criminal Appeal No. 1532 of 2005
Criminal Appeal No. 864 of 2011
[Arising out of SLP (Crl.) 842 of 2006)
because if we see that they have made an appeal to the SC undestood that there should any one appela no of that year so why this many number as all the accused are convicted at the same time in the same case ? can we say as per [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) 842 of 2006)the appeal & SLP are mergered ?
so solve this huge problem which i am confused.
Thanks.
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 11 April 2011
also meaning of the symbol @
R.Ramachandran
(Expert) 11 April 2011
First please indicate as to in what way you are interested in this matter.
There are several decisions/judgments by the Supreme Court. Why did you select only this judgment for your query. Is there any special reason for doing so.
