Vijay Kumar
01 November 2008 at 23:29
What is the limitation for moving SC under art. 32 for violation of rights granted under art.21?
Neeraj Chawla
01 November 2008 at 20:07
DEAR SIR,,
THE UNDERSIGNED IS NATIONAL PRESIDENT OF THE ANTI-CORRUPTION FEDERATION OF INDIA (REGD.). MYSELF NEED TO ASK A QUERY REGARDING A FALSE CASE REGISTERED AGAINST ONE MR. NARESH DHALL WHO DARED TO BROUGHT CORRUPT OFFICIALS BOOKED WITH THE HELP OF C.B.I. AND HIMSELF GOT IMPLICATED IN A FALSE CASE REGISTERED BY THE LUDHIANA POLICE AT P.S. KOTWALI ON THE COMPLAINT OF THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER (OFFICIATING) OF THE SAME NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, KESAR GANJ MANDI BRANCH, LUDHIANA. THE CASE IS AS FOLLOWS:-
IN F.I.R. NO. 81 REGISTERED AT P.S. KOTWALI, LUDHIANA DATED 03-10-2008
U/S 379,419,120B IPC
ALLEGATIONS ALLEGED BY THE COMPLAINANT NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY’S DIVISIONAL MANAGER (OFFICIATING) S. JASPAL SINGH
1. THAT ON RECEIPT OF REPORT OF SURVEY BY MITTAL SURVEYORS AS PER THEIR RECOMMENDATION THE DEPARTMENT PROMPTLY COMPLETED ALL FORMALITIES FOR TIMELY DISBURSEMENT OF CLAIM CHEQUE TO NARESH DHALL WHO WAS DULY INFORMED. THAT ON DATED 30-05-2007 COMPLAINANT JASPAL SINGH WAS PRESENT IN HIS ALONGWITH O.P. MALHOTRA DEPUTY MANAGER AND AROUND 4.15 P.M. THE ACCUSED MR. NARESH DHALL CAME ALONGWITH ONE GENTLEMAN AND NARESH DHALL INTRODUCED THE SAID GENTLEMAN AS SENIOR OFFICER OF CBI CHANDIGARH. MR. NARESH DHALL ASKED THE COMPLAINANT THAT THIS CLAIM FILE BE SHOWN TO CBI OFFICER FROM CBI AS HE HAS TO PERUSE THE DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH INVESTIGATION. THE COMPLAINANT JASPAL SINGH BELEIVING THE SAID GENTLEMAN TO BE THE SENIOR OFFICER OF THE CBI HANDED OVER THE CLAIM FILE DOCUMENTS AS TO ASSIST HIM FOR THR PURPOSE OF THE INVESTIGATION. THAT SO CALLED SENIOR OFFICIAL OF CBI WHILE GOING THROUGH THE CLAIM FILE TOOK OUT THE CLAIM CHEQUE OF RS.6,02,067/= AND LATER ON 6.6.2007 DULY SIGNED CONSENT LETTER OF MR. NARESH DHALL FROM THE CLAIM FILE AND TOLD THAT AS THE MATTER REGARDING THIS CLAIM IS UNDER INVERSTIGATION WITH CBI AS SUCH HE HAS TO DISCUSS WITH SENIOR OFFICIAL OF CBI UPON WHICH CBI OFFICER STARTED CONTACTING HIS SENIOR OFFICIAL ON TELEPHONE AND WHILE TALKING ON PHONE MOVED OUT FROM THE OFFICE OF THE COMPLAINANT WITH CLAIM CHEQUE. NOTEDLY NARESH DHALL KEPT SITTING WITH COMPLAINANT IN THE OFFICE ITSELF AND TOLD JASPAL SINGH THAT WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF CBI OFFICIALS HE CAN NOT COMPLY WITH ANY FORMALITY AND ASSURED THAT SENIOR OFFICER OF CBI SHALL BE BACK AS SOON AS HE GET NOD FROM HIS SENIOR OFFICIALS HE WILL SIGN THE RECEIPT. BUT AFTER HAVING WAITED FOR NEARLY 2 HOUR THE SENIOR OFFICER OF CBI DID NOT RETURN AND NARESH DHALL TOLD THE COMPLAINANT THAT THE SENIOR OFFICER OF CBI AND HIS TEAM HAS COME FROM CHANDIGARH IN CONNECTION WITH ___________ OTHER RAIDS TO BE CONDUCTED IN LUDHIANA TODAY AND PROMISED TO COMPLETE AND SIGNED THE REST OF FORMALITIES NEXT DAY.
2. THE COMPLAINANT FURTHER ALLEGED THAT NARESH DHALL NEVER RETURNED AND IT WAS REVEALED LATER ON THAT NO OFFICER OF CBI CHANDIGARH WAS DEPUTED BY CBI WITH NARESH DHALL TO SECURE THE DOCUMENTS AND INSPECT THE FILE FOR THE PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION.
VERSION OF THE ACCUSED MR. NARESH DHALL:
1. IF ON 30-05-2007 ACCUSED MR. NARESH DHALL AND ONE OTHER PERSON (ONLY KNOWN TO HIM) WHO WAS INTRODUCED BY MR. NARESH DHALL AS CBI OFFICER AS THE COMPLAINANT ALLEGED THAT SO CALLED SENIOR OFFICIAL OF CBI WHILE GOING THROUGH THE CLAIM FILE TOOK OUT THE CLAIM CHEQUE OF RS.6,02,067/= WHY THE CONCERNED AUTHORITIES OF NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, KESAR GANJ MANDI BRANCH, LUDHIANA DIDN’T INFORM THE POLICE AUTHORITIES AND PROCEED FOR THE STOP PAYMENT OF CHEQUE. ACTUALLY THE CHEQUE WAS IN FAVOUR OF M/S SHALLY COLLECTION WHOSE PROPRIETOR IS MR. NARESH DHALL ONLY & IT WAS A PAYEE’S A/C CHEQUE. THE COMPLAINANT MR. JASPAL SINGH, DIVISIONAL MANAGER OF THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, KESAR GANJ MANDI BRANCH, LUDHIANA SIGNED THE SAME CHEQUE ONLY AT THE TIME WHILE HANDING OVER IT TO THE ACCUSED MR. NARESH DHALL WHO WAS THERE ONLY TO OBTAIN THE CHEQUE AFTER HE GOT THE INFORMATION GIVEN BY MR. JASPAL SINGH, DIVISIONAL MANAGER OF THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, KESAR
Vivek Banginwar
01 November 2008 at 19:47
Sir, kindly provide me a format of 7/12 extract and mutation in english format urgently.
thanks
ram
01 November 2008 at 18:28
Sir, Will you please the information about the gezette copy of whith areas applied the Depost of title Deed in AP Thank @
V V SATYANARAYANA
01 November 2008 at 17:54
Sirs,
In the the year 2002 in June & August we have procured 3 cranes at a cost of Rs. 1 crore each from a reputed cranes manufacturing in India.
In August 2004 we have purchased one more crane from them. Right from the delivery of the equipment at the site, these machines have not been performing and persistently giving troube and we could not get desired production from these 4 equipments. Though the Seller was attending but never the problems were sorted out. If a defect is rectified again another defect would crop up like that.For rectifying these defects also we have spent lakhs of rupees on each of these 4 cranes. Made full payments to the Party except in one case where we have deducted very little towards non-performance (there is no legal dispute for this deducted amount).
Finally the Seller stopped manufacturer stopped the manufacture of these cranes from 2006 or 2007 that means there might be some design fault or so. We have made several correspondences by way of lodging complaints highlighting the problems right through.
Can we at this stage can write to them to compensate for the losses we have suffered or can we approach the Consumer Forum for the deficiency in service.
Is there any remedy available to us and whether we have lost the opportunity under Limitation Act.
Kindly give your opinion as to what best we can do for redressal.
Thanking you,
V.V.Satyanarayana
Bharat Gala
01 November 2008 at 17:18
Sir,
My querry is whether Company Can file the case in consumer Forum for recovery of short claim from Insurance Comapny ??
bhuushan bankar
01 November 2008 at 15:38
if there is consent term taken place in a spl. civil suit can the defendants that is any one of them can file another suit challenging the consent term which they have agreed to and which was read to them by their Adv. and also the judge had asked them whether they agreed this consent term .... so can any one of them harass the plaintiff for more money
G. ARAVINTHAN
01 November 2008 at 13:14
An Insolvency petition is dismissed for default. What is the procedure to restore it?
A K SARAVANAN
01 November 2008 at 13:04
A Dispute between land owner and super structure owner from long years, finally the commissioner of Land Adminsitration was passed a order in favour of us on 1992.
Land vested to government and super structure owner can move to patta.
The Land owner Writ petition filed to Madras High court on 1997 (after five years), case is pending till date. (01.11.2008) In the connections ,We are moving patta during the period from 1992.
Now we are trying patta under TN Free townside vested land patta Scheme.
Our doubt:
1. Writ petition is pending in the case
2. If we are getting patta from government under TN Free vested land scheme, the patta is valuable or not.
3. Writ petition filed after 5 years, the case is stand or not (I think time barred)
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Immigration. Reclaiming Indian Nationality.
How can an Indian born citizen whose parents migrated to Pakistan at the time of Partition when she was 3 years old reclaim her Indian nationality. She is a US citizen now, living in United States of America.
Can she also apply for her three kids. Two adults and one minor.
yellownpurple2002@yahoo.com