Sanat Kanrar
02 May 2022 at 15:32
Sir, Here developer is a partnership firm having six active partners. The firm entered into an agreement with the landowner to develop flats and sell them as per settled terms . After completion, the developer issued an possession certificate to the land owner having signed by two partners only. Is it valid in the eye of law:
Anonymous
02 May 2022 at 02:21
Hi,
My father had farm land property in tumkur and he tried to sell this property to buyer in 2014 nad he made sale deed agreement on it, and buyer details is showing in EC but not in RTC. Presently my father and mother is no more. There is note in sale deed saying once issue with karab jamin is resolved then will make complete registration.
I want to know can I cancel this sale deed agreement
Paras Chhajed
01 May 2022 at 19:32
An assessment order under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was passed by assessing officer on 30th March2022 which is signed digitally by him with an expired digital signature whose validity ended on 09th February.2022.
Please advise as to validity and legality of the assessment order digitally signed with an expired Digital Signature according to The Information Technology Act, 2000 or any other law.
K K S V SOMESWAR
01 May 2022 at 12:50
A filed a complaint against B and criminal case under Sec 507 chargesheet was filed in court against B. Since there is no proper evidence and nothing was seized from B, B filed a quash petition in High Court. High Court ordered for issue of notice to A why this is not admitted and allowed B not to attend trial in criminal court except on mandatory calls. As such notice was issued by B's advocate to A by registered post with acknowledgement due. The notice was returned since door locked to the flat of A. High Court gave next date as 17.6.22 and the trial in criminal court starts on 28.10.22. Will the High Court allows quash petition though notice is returned as door locked ?
raju
01 May 2022 at 08:30
Summoned witness did not appear and authorised someone else on his behalf to produce records. Even court accept and mentioned u/s 91(2) of cr.pc. that witness cannot be compelled. Although summoned witness was also required to give evidence along with records. My query is how to challenge this before higher court and set aside section 91(2) crpc.
Anonymous
01 May 2022 at 03:11
Wife isn't working, No child.
Wife files 498a/306/34 and 125 crpc simultaneously
I filed for divorce and got decree
Divorce decree was granted in my favour on the grounds of cruelty u/s 13 (1) (i-a)
similar observations were made by the Judge there was a hand written evidence- an apology letter by wife which mentioned that she will not commit any mistake (lie, willful desertion etc), in future so as to she wanted to join matrimonial home.
I contested both 498a and 125crpc
We all in the family were aquitted in u/s 498a /406/34 IPC.
Brief observations by Honorable court in 498a & Grounds for acquittal given by court were.
1. No demand towards dowry before/in/about the time of marriage has come on record.
2. It is proven that she left her matrimonial home without any cause and what to say about any demand of any kind of harrassment met to her, ignoring the fact that accused no1 had been pleading her intensely to talk and inform him if she had any grievances at her matrimonial home and not to leave the same.
3.Thus in view of recorded conversation which consists of the constant facts stated by the complainant contradicting her deposition before this court and also approach towards truth it is held that her deposition regarding demand of dowry and beatings and maltreatment are not trustworthy and the allegations as made by complainant are held as disapproved.
4.In present case after going through the evidence collectively and more specifically the recorded conversation complainant is not found as truthful witness.
5. Chronology of the events also shows that the complainant did not celebrate even a single festival at her matrimonial home. The evidence produced only shows that complainant had been maintaining herself most of the time at her mother's place and she had left her matrimonial house even last time without any cause.
6.The intention of the complainant to join the company of her husband at her matrimonial house also does not justify her act of making false accusations against the accused or his family members. In the present case the complainant allowed the web of falsehood to be woven against her husband and she herself assisted the same. Therefore the complainant cannot take plea of her intention to achieve the objective of saving matrimony in order to be untruthful and untrustworthy. Not only this , law does not recognise putting false accusations as lawful excuse.
I am still ordered to pay double amount what i was paying as interim maintenance, I am contesting thsi with revision petition in HC ( pending)
my query is how can i use these judgements in my favour in 125 crpc or can I file counter cases to stop their demand.
Anonymous
30 April 2022 at 21:54
Hi There
My mutation rejected 3 times in Ranchi Jharkhand. In last rejection one msg showing "This order is completely appealable. Appeal can be made against the order to the competent court"
Can i apply again?
Anonymous
30 April 2022 at 03:43
Question 1. What is the validity of POA (made in Delhi), which does not have any clause/ condition stating its end date? Example If POA made in completed (stamp papers, duly signed etc.) in Jan 2022, can this be used in Jan 2025 (three years later) ?
Question 2. If the POA has been made outside of India then " it should be stamped and adjudicated within three months after receipt in India." What does this mean, as an additional Indian stamp papers need to be bought (depending upon which state)? . Request if the process is explained and then how long will it be valid?
Rohit Shrivastava
29 April 2022 at 16:22
Require a lawyer to file a petition in the consumer court, Bandra, Mumbai.
Wrong product shipped by a company, and refusing to take back and refund the paid money, amount is INR 17,999/-
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Possession cert
Sir, Here developer is a partnership firm having six active partners. The firm entered into an agreement with the landowner to develop flats and sell them as per settled terms . After completion, the developer issued an possession certificate to the land owner having signed by two partners only. Is it valid in the eye of law: