Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Queries Participated

Dr.Chandran Peechulli   02 November 2010 at 19:13

Injustice to Ex.serviceman(Senior Citizen).Justice given to Money & Muscle Power.

Respected Expert Mr.Shashikumar Sir,

It is not that I expect my case to move like electrical system during the surge of electronics development age. Please try to understand that the expression of ex-serviceman and senior citizen made is to state that an ex-serviceman has once come forward to serve the nation and it is the locals of Bangalore seen as the sons of the soil in my case. As I have purchased 2 plots for my two sons in 1983, from the 30 sites layout formed in 1983. Rest 28 plot owners who purchased from the 30 plots site layout are not disturbed or made a party in the partition case O.S.341/2004. When I was to file a suit against the accused, my suit was put pending, asking me to submit all the original land documents for which, I was shunted to Chennai from Bangalore and back for completeness of originals to be surrendered, for accepting the suit and during the process my case was late numbered, original suit 365/2004, in the meanwhile a partition suit (O.S.341/2004.) was filed by the accused, making me only a party as respondents along with their elder brothers (signatories in the irrevocable GPA) of that time (1983) exclusive of the other purchasers of my time, just because I am a resident of Chennai and the rest (28 plot owners were local Bangalore residents). Liberal adjournments since 2004, necessitating my being shunted to Bangalore from Chennai and back. I hope this is not a small period, if one puts himself in my place and being harassed and humiliated unwantedly by the accused who took law into their hands, forcefully entering into my plot and pulling out the erected stone-pillars connected with barbed wires around the site and putting up a katcha shed overnight and black-mailing me. It took though 7 days to obtain a F.I.R. from local jurisdictional Police Station, after reporting the issue to C.O.P. who directed me to S.P and I.G.P(Bangalore Rural)and after IGP advising me to seek solution from the court of law, this exercise started(2004) and still awaiting justice. Justice makes no mention for the accused who took law into their hands but the case being dismissed in Bangalore City Civil Court i.e. O.S.365/2004 & R.A.117/2009. Fast Track Court 2. During the pendency of the case, despite “Status Quo” the accused went ahead modifying the katcha-shed to a home for living.
In fact, it has electrified me after putting in my best of efforts, time and money, during the last seven long years. Is it not encouraging the criminals to grow in society seeking easy and fast money. One of the advocates in Bangalore were saying that they exist because of their existence. This is the poor state of affairs in a learned society. WHEN ALL THIS COULD HAVE BEEN NIPPED-UP, INITIALLY IF LAW & ORDER WAS AFFECTIVE.

Hence, I needed the expert advices Sir. Thank you very much.
Dr.ChandranPeechulli,Ph.D;FIE;