Biased expert opinion
sarada_prasan
(Querist) 13 April 2012
This query is : Resolved
In the case of murder of my sister inside her in-laws house, PM doctor says "......, it is a case of suicidal hanging, but the ligature is not possible by the saree seized.
Upon a lot of struggle, the police sent all the evidences to the FM&T Expert for the opinion on few important points.
But, the opinion received from the expert, are simply different from what all FM&T Book (J Modi, Bernard Knight, CJ Polson) says and also other experts in the FM&T says.
So, what should I do now in this Indian Judiciary system, to get justice. Please guide me.
The details of the case is at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Sulekha_Dalai.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 13 April 2012
The evidence of witness is more vital or important than the report of expert.
So try to manage the witnesses if any.
M/s. Y-not legal services
(Expert) 14 April 2012
if you are a layman nothing you can do without an advocate's help..
in your case state only will prosecute on behalf of the defacto complainant..
so just follow them..
-tom-
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 14 April 2012
If you have witnesses to prove the murder then expert opinion against you are differences affecting you may not be so fatal.
sarada_prasan
(Querist) 14 April 2012
Dear Prabhakar sir,
My sister's death is inside her in-laws house and it is a case of murder. Court has charged the case with 302 also, though the investing agency (police & PM doctors)are in the version of suicidal death.
How can I get the witnesses?
Can I use spirit call as an evidence?
SAINATH DEVALLA
(Expert) 14 April 2012
Dear Prasan,
It is a clear cut understanding between your sister's household,the police and the medical experts.Money has played a vital part in converting the murder into suicide.They will be having alibi in favour of them and favourable witnesses too. your drawback is you don't possess sufficient evidence or witness in your favour.I have gone through the entire case history on the web.Everything favours their household.
PARTHA P BORBORA
(Expert) 14 April 2012
Dear quarist, i have carefully gone through the details available in winkipedia. Yes it is very painful to observes such contradictory opinions of the experts. But those are opinions only. You will get the the opportunity to cross the experts during trial and to establish your points. The investigation and expert opinions are not finale. You just need a brilliant criminal lawyer to assist the public prosecutor during trial. Keep faith on our judiciary, it will give u every opportunity to prove your case. So be prepared for the trial. With all of my good wishes brother. Just prepare for the trial.
Shashikant V. Patil
(Expert) 14 April 2012
Experts are right. Also emphasis on circumstantial evidence while in trial.
Shonee Kapoor
(Expert) 14 April 2012
Here the presumption of dowry death would always be there.
If the witnesses stand and hold ground during cross. The accused would be convicted.
Regards,
Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 14 April 2012
Digging the grave.
With our corrupted judiciary & Police & Adm of Justice !!
Vain is the struggle.
Unfortunate, we are in India , with best Laws, and worst administration, as NO NITI , NO DHARAM, ONLY MONEY!!
I WENT THRU THE INTERNET, I understand, it is total injustice. Human Rights & Women Organisations have to play their Role.
Need more Media involvement to grab , force , justice.
sarada_prasan
(Querist) 14 April 2012
Respected Mr. Shroff,
Thanks for suggestion.
I had been to Human Rights. And after long wait got the reply that "the case is in court of law", hence disposed as per .... rule. And the same answer from the police complaint authority/Lokpal, Odisha.
Both found the case as satisfactorily, as a suicidal death. And especially the changing of photos by the then Investigating police could not be found by the PCA & Human Rights, though things are clear with RTI reply.
I could not know, if the system is being run by such useless, how is the system going on and how innocent survive?
But one thing to add herewith that, the certified copy of the note sheet of the case revealed that....all the three accused has been charged for 302, 304(b), 34 and 4 DP act.
This may be due to expertise of the expert, Judiciary.
Thanks.
