RTIAct 2005
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist) 10 April 2011
This query is : Resolved
Thanks again Sirs
Since replied quickly.
The RTI case is : On some complaints to Rly.Vig. Dept questioned the applicant as there was no corruption ,so, they raised that some favour has been shown to relatives of Applicant, who were forced to give statement under duress & a chargesheet was issued and DE is pending.So applicant wanted information who are complainants & who were associated in vig case? Though RTIAct Section 8(1)g & j are exempted for parting infm.But Bhagatsingh case was decided by Delhi H/Court in similarly situated casefor parting information . CIC didn't listen those cited cases and passed the order not to part infmn, Query is can H/Court be requested to pass stricture agnst CIC and also part with the documents for taking agnst concocted complaints for vested interest later on since no element of corruption was involved, as their men could not come out successfulin recruitment from whom they had collected huge sum, which was refunded later on (learnt from reliable sources).Thanks.
R.Ramachandran
(Expert) 11 April 2011
If you are not satisfied with the decision of the CIC better approach the High Court in appeal. The HC will decide the matter - either upholding the decision of the CIC or giving any other direction to CIC. The question of your seeking the HC to pass strictures against the CIC etc., does not at all arise. Better confine yourself to your case - do not overstep and try to seek any such strictures - it is not your job. Just because the HC gave certain orders in one case (which you call as similar case) does not mean the same will applicable to another case also. It all depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case.
