allurisivajiraju
10 November 2008 at 22:26
Respected Seniors,
Dear Sir " The Madras Act " ( Act No. 3 of 1905 ) is in force or repealed.
Thanking You Sir.
amit kumar choubey
10 November 2008 at 19:29
Respected All,
I would like to ask in which states the registration of Lease agreement for a term of less than a year is compulsorily required to be registered.
With Regards
Amit
mintu
10 November 2008 at 16:22
Sir
Kindly asvise me on following facts:
X Co. Ltd. is a public limited company having its object clauses like the following:
Main Object:
a.Manufacturing, branding, selling, etc cigarettes and other tobacco products.
b.Purchasing all materials needed to manufacture, brand, patent of the above products and all assets including plants and machinery needed.
Ancillary Objects:
a.Enter into any contracts, lease agreement, etc for the purpose of the main objects.
b.Manufacture, sale and otherwise disposal of any byproducts.
Other objects:
a.Manufacturing consumable food stuffs and selling the same.
b.Doing any other business that the company deems it profitable and beneficial to the company
Can a company have such a vague object such as "DOING ANY OTHER BUSINESS THAT THE COMPANY DEEMS IT PROFITABLE AND BENEFICIAL TO THE COMPANY" ?Please tell provision or caselaw if any.
Directors of the Board of the said company ask for your advice on the proposal of starting a Hotel business in Bangalore. Give a detailed advice to the company.
Thanking you
mintu kumar
Murugesh
10 November 2008 at 12:37
Dear Sirs,
We have a new project in Kerala and we engaged EPC contract. our manpower is only management staffs like Engineers, Senor Engineers managers etc( not workers or labours). Since it is a on site job our normal working hours are 10+1.
As per labour law 8 hours daily working time and 50 hrs OT for a month is applicable ( as per my knowledge ). But in our case it may go more if we will keep daily working hours as 8 hrs. we are ready to pay more money to staff if they worked more hours. But my question is " the rule of 50 hr OT per month". In our past case many time the OT hrs exceed 50 hrs. Also we dont want to increase manpower instead of giving OT. If the staffs agreed to work for 10 hrs per day, is it possible? please clarify.
Arihant AC
10 November 2008 at 11:01
Dear All
I want to know that whether PF Act is applicable to Transporters or Carriers Contractor in Sugar Mills ?
In this matter Civil appeal no. 354/2000 in Supreme Court between Ramala Sahakari Chini Mills Ltd. & Employees Provident Fund Commissioner was set aside and the said matter is remitted to RPFC for fresh adjudication.
Please give me a fresh judgement on this as it is very necessary for South Gujarat Sugar Mills.
Regards,
Nehal
N.K.Assumi
10 November 2008 at 08:14
What is the distinction between void and illegal in contract? Can any one illustrate the difference between the two? Thanks in advance.
madhukar
09 November 2008 at 20:43
Sir,
i had given rs 2 lac to my friend (as financial help for his marriage) five year back without any legal documents.still after five years he is not repaid it i do not have documentary evidence except in year 2005 he had issued me 4 cheques of 50000 each.this i have not deposited bcoz he said that he do not have sufficient balance in a/c.
1.is anything i can do legally to get my money back from him.
2. now he is saying to me that i should arrange for loan for rs 2 lac & he will repay the loan from his salary.accordingly i had arranged a loan of rs 2 lac from a pvt party.the party is paying 2 lac to me.& my friend will repay it in five years to him with interest. party has asked for PDC from him for five years.
how this can be legalize &what type of agreement we should make so that we (party &me) will able to take legal action in case dishonor of cheque happens in future.
pl suggest me best possible action.
Surender Dhull
09 November 2008 at 20:41
Accused No. 1 is Co. through its one director, remaining two accused impleaded as accused No. 2 and 3 by the complainant CO. Most interesting that accused No. 1 is the CO. through its one director (means 3rd director except acuused No. 2 and 3)
Further the trial court held guilty all the three accused and convicted 6 Months R I Imprisonment and 30 Lac Comensation jointly and severely liabile.
Next, all the three accused filed appeal seperately and complaninant also filed revision for enhancment the compensation and conviction.
Next, In appeal, accused No. 1 and 2 compounded each other after paying the 28 Lac and the Lok Adalat confirm the settlement of accused No. 1 and 2.
Now the accused No. 3 is facing the appeal before the appellate court.
Q. 1.- whether the Lok Adalat can compounded this case if the liability is jointly and severely passed by the trial court?
Q. 2- If accused No. 1 and 2 paid Rs. 28 Lac against the compensation passed i.e. 30 Lac then whether the accused is entitle only to the extent to remaining amount i.e 2 Lac.
Q. No. 3- If the accused No. 1 CO. compunded the matter in the Lak Adalat then the accused No. 3 is liable for vicarious liability.
allurisivajiraju
09 November 2008 at 17:27
Resected Seniors,
Due to non co-operation of bailiffs the Dhr is not in a possession to execute the civil arrest warrant which was passed by the Court against JDr.
As a matter of fact the Court issued fresh warrant nearly 10 times against JDr. The JDr is working as Head Master in Govt High School. Each and every occassion the Bailiff's are co-operated to JDr. for non execution of warrant.
In the above circumstances the DHr. filed a petition U/S 151 of C.P.C. prays that to direct the concerned SHO (Police) to secure the presence of the JDr with a view to avoid the interferance of Bailiffs.
Now my question is whether the said petition is maintainable under Law or Not?
If yes, please refer some citations to that effect.
If not, what is the alternative remedy to the DHr to proper execution of arrest warrant.
Thanking You Sir.
Member Strength 9,49,713 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
adverse possession on government land for agriculuture
sir,
i am in possession of agricultural land which belongs to me in 1960 and government records were change by law i didnt plough that land for 3 yrs. the 7/12 extract is on government name but i m still in possession and farming on the land every year.
haw can i get records on my name as adverse possession?
what are the evidence is required to claim adverse possession?
is there any judgements of the same cases is available?
please reply soon.