Terrorism and international law
amal
(Querist) 16 August 2014
This query is : Resolved
Two countries X and Y are neighbours .A terrorist group bombed capital city of X on 2008 ,while one terrorist was arrested ,the rest fled to country Y.the country Y has not taken any measures despite requests from X to apprehend the terrorists . The country Y has failed in contolling terrorists and is incapable .so the army of country X entered Y ,arrested the terrorists from country Y ,without the permission of government of Y is this justifiable ??
Guest
(Expert) 16 August 2014
Is this justifiable on your part to pose such an hypothetical question when neither you are the head of the country X or Y, nor representing the army of X?
However, if you belong to terrorist group and have any objection to the army entering the country Y, please discuss your real problem to sort out your own pwersonal problem. Otherwise, you should not have expected the experts to hold tutorial class on international law for you on this site.
ajay sethi
(Expert) 17 August 2014
hypothetical query
amal
(Querist) 17 August 2014
yes its an hypothetical question ,i am a law student and this was the problem asked in 31 st all india moot court competition 2008-2009 .when i came over this problem i did my
research and thought i would dicuss here
amal
(Querist) 17 August 2014
i want to know whether country X has violated article 2(4)of united nations charter
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 17 August 2014
ask your teacher..this is not a law school.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 22 August 2014
This is neither a tutorial class nor is a platform to discuss about moot court competition, do not post such queries in this section.
