Accused persons to be devided or not?
GANGAM.RAJENDER.
(Querist) 03 August 2013
This query is : Resolved
1.NI ACT 138 CASE HAS BEEN REGISTERED IN THE YEAR 2006.THE SAID CHEQUE BELONGS TO EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY AND IT WAS FORGED BY THE THIRD PARTY.THIRD PARTY IS THE FRIEND OF MY DIRECTORS. THE ACCUSED PERSONS ARE A1 TO A8,BUT A1 TO A4 ARE ATTENDING THE HON'BLE COURT ,BUT A5 TO A8 ARE NOT ATTENDING THE HON'BLE COURT AND THEY ARE NOT RECEIVED THE SUMMONS ALSO. COMPLAINANT NOT INTERESTED TO FIND CORRECT ADDRESS OF A5 TO A8. PRESENT THEY ARE NOT RESIDING THE LOCAL LIMITS.
2. PLS EXPLAIN CAN WE SPLIT THE CASE? AND AT
THIS STAGE CAN WE SEEK SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION UNDER EVIDENCE ACT SEC' 45?
3. PLS EXPLAIN THE PROCEDURE AND GIVE ME CASE LAWS RELATING TO SPLIT THE CASE AT PRESENT STAGE. PLS SIR WE ARE SUFFERING
SINCE 2006. THANKING YOU SIR.
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 03 August 2013
can engage hand writing / Expert
Get their opinion, and prove.
Court may or may not issue process against A5-8:
Check whether process was issued against A5-8 . If not, u cant do anything now. Time barred.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 05 August 2013
You have not stated your identity. It is difficult to come to conclusion after going through your query whether you are complainant or the accused.
First clarify this initial requirement and then expect the reply.
