Property transferred illegally using incorrect documents.

padmanabha guptha (Querist) 25 February 2013 This query is : Resolved
My son-in-law demised during 2004 and his property dealings are mentioned below.
1) The revenue land in survey Numb 61/2 to an extent of 5acre 20guntas has been transferred from his mother to his and his five other brothers’ name vide mutation No:M.R:4/93-94
2) Out of which, land to an extent of 28 1/4guntas has been sold to sri Mounachar S/o channappaviraachar vide S.R.O.No:2288/96-97 by all brothers including himself. Also he himself has purchased 31 3/4guntas of land vide S.R.O.No:2289/96-97 duly signed by all stating they are leaving independently but money is required for sister marriage.
3) After one year, they separated vide partition deed No: 1157/97-98 and the remaing 4acres of land in survey no:61/2 has been divided among the brothers. In which he received 1acre 19guntas and parted as 61/2p4 for which RTC also received.
4) Subsequently, he has sold the land to an extent of 30 3/4 guntas (purchased as mentioned in Sl No:2) vide S.R.O.No.2568/97-98 to sri Niranjanmurthy S/o Mounachar. In this sale deed, the S.R.O.No:2289/96-97 is mentioned.
5) Some part of the land received as per Sl No:3 (61/2p4) has been sold and 5guntas has been donated to his wife by him. After his demise land remained in his favour was 26.04guntas.
The land, 26.04guntas, so remained in 61/2p4 in his name and 5guntas in his wife’s name has been got transferred in the name of sri Niranjanmurthy S/o Mounachar during 2011 instead of actual land mentioned in Sl No:4.
For this the order reference of Asst Commissioner, revenue department is mentioned. In which, it is stated that as per E.C. and thahashildar report, the order is placed mentioning 61/2 only. But while preparing the Mutation, it is mentioned that 61/2 land is retained as it is but the land under 61/2p4 has been changed in favour of sri Niranjanmurthy S/o Mounachar cancelling both my son-in-law and my daughter’s ownership. Accordingly, RTC is also prepared.
It is not understood, how it is possible? Land sold belongs to 61/2 bought before partition but land for which RTC is prepared and ownership changed belongs to 61/2p4 received after partition. I am requesting Tahshildar and Sub register to rectify the mistake and to restore their rights.
I request the experts to guide me in resolving my problem

Follow Query

Report Abuse