LCI Learning
New LIVE Course: Toxicology and Law. Batch begins 21st July. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Rekha.....   05 March 2009 at 20:09

Points of Argument

Hello Respected Members
Nice meeting u
Our Problem how to argue? V r Plaintiff
Matter is of Money recovery Suit in the court of Asst.Civil Judge (I)
The Plaintiff filed his affidavit with all 25 documents and 10 documents r zerox(coz these original documents were sent to the defendants at the time of correspondence)The Hon’ble Judge asked to submit the application for the documents are to be exhibited. Now said application is fix for hearing. The Defendants may take objections.
So please spare sm time for us n dictate sm points of argument.

siddhartha pydipati   05 March 2009 at 18:57

adoption of a boy

a couple has a girlchild.they wanted to adopt a boy.can the boy stake a claim in the property of the couple in future?

P.RAVIKUMAR   05 March 2009 at 18:33

court recovery from salaries

One of my friend at Andhra, working in a Central Govt. In a recovery of personal debt suit, the AP Court has ordered to recover a portion of his salaries to satisfy the debtors. Will it be applicable for his final settlement on his death (he is no more now).

SARAVANAN.R   05 March 2009 at 18:03

provisions in law regarding strikes and lock out in factories not coming under Public Utility Services

Dear Sir,

I have received indepth answers regarding strikes and lock outs in public utility services and notices etc. I once again thank our experts.

In case the factory not coming under public utility services, viz APPOLLO TYRES OR ANY OTHER PRIVATE FACTORIES,what is the procedure envisaged under I.D ACT.

One of the experts have opined in his answer that a government Order saying that the lock out is illegal will help the worker in claiming back wages.

But then why workers in private factories or factories not coming under Government control are denied justice. To quote one of the examples, I have a factory KERALA SPINNERS LTD or BALARAMAPURAM SPINNING MILLS .
Sir, If the management of a private factory is not co-operating, is there any provisions in our law to enable the Government to take over the factory or dispose off the land or give it to any other party or forcefully take the land or any other measures that will ultimately benefit the society as a whole.

Is there any possibility for an ex-parte judgement in labour issues.

I would be grateful, if I can get an answer.

Saravanan

SARAVANAN.R   05 March 2009 at 18:02

provisions in law regarding strikes and lock out in factories not coming under Public Utility Services

Dear Sir,

I have received indepth answers regarding strikes and lock outs in public utility services and notices etc. I once again thank our experts.

In case the factory not coming under public utility services, viz APPOLLO TYRES OR ANY OTHER PRIVATE FACTORIES,what is the procedure envisaged under I.D ACT.

One of the experts have opined in his answer that a government Order saying that the lock out is illegal will help the worker in claiming back wages.

But then why workers in private factories or factories not coming under Government control are denied justice. To quote one of the examples, I have a factory KERALA SPINNERS LTD or BALARAMAPURAM SPINNING MILLS .
Sir, If the management of a private factory is not co-operating, is there any provisions in our law to enable the Government to take over the factory or dispose off the land or give it to any other party or forcefully take the land or any other measures that will ultimately benefit the society as a whole.

Is there any possibility for an ex-parte judgement in labour issues.

I would be grateful, if I can get an answer.

Saravanan

sampat mane   05 March 2009 at 14:59

Handing over of Property

A Case was filed for sharing of property by my dad against his brother. All the property purchses were made in the name of Elder brother. On his death he made will to pass those in his 2 daughters son's name(he did not have direct son)

The case was file in Satara civit court in year 2001. And their was ex-party decision in our favor in year 2005. This was challenged by them and now it is languishing in the courts for various reason :
1. Case transfer
2. Steps Unready
3. Filing of Say
4. Hearing
5. Argument on Exh.
6. Notice Unready.
Its almost 4 years now we have not occupied the property which is rightfully ours
Can you please inform how much maximum time does the the court takes to decide to handover the property after the decision

What steps to be taken or early redressal.
Can the advocate be blamed for not following up properly

Please reply on this

Heaven 2011   05 March 2009 at 13:34

Legal drafting

Dear Sir,

Kindly advise which one is the best book of Indian legal drafting? In my office i have to draft various agreements like cost allocation agreement,Memorendum of understanding, development agreement etc i hardly become able to manage any format in the books I have.If I get any reference from U it will be helpful for me.

Regards,

Asish

anil LL.M   05 March 2009 at 13:19

relaxsation for the post of Sub-Inspector (Enforcement)

sir i have for applied for the above post
wethter i would also cosidered OBC in chandigirh also

sir i am resident of haryna ibelonge to the cast of OBC , so pls sir
intimate me for the relaxsation of age in case of my concerns
my date of birth is 01 oct 1983.
i am law graduate (three year)

sir age limit is 25 but for SC ,OBC is relexation is three. whether i am also treat OBC in chandigarh also as i am BC in haryana and i also have a certificate for OBC also.

Jatin Sapra 9312223345,Delhi   05 March 2009 at 12:10

Urgent Query

Hi ,
I am an advocate practicing in Delhi since 2005.
I wana to aske whether it will be goos for me to go for LLM from UK.
And from which specialise field i should look for it to increase my chances of getting job here in India.

Ramesh   05 March 2009 at 11:56

The Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952

One of our contractor is not paying provident fund amount of his workmen to the PF Dept as he says that his workmen are excluded employees under Para 2 (f) of the PF Scheme as they are drawing more than Rs.6500/-

He has produced case law Andhra University V/s RPFC 1985 (51) FLR 605(SC)

Our contention is he will have to pay PF contribution upto the amount of Rs.6500/- above Rs.6500/- he may not deduct and pay.

Kindly give your opinion on the above

Regards,
Ramesh Mande