Gaurang Tripathi 
19 May 2024 at 09:09
I need an affidavit attested by first class magistrate for non judicial purpose . Who are the officers as First Class Magistrate in Madhya Pradesh who have the jurisdiction to attest the affidavit? Is the District Magistrate or SDM authorized?
Lauradice
19 May 2024 at 06:07
Just At a point in time, I was just so curious about my husband sudden change in attitude and home and to the kids, He was actually trying to sell of the whole house and give out the money to a lady, I wouldn’t have gotten to know this if not for this great Man who came to my rescue, he help me get his hourly messages and also calls and his location right on my phone and he never got to know anything. All thanks to ethical hacker, you can contact him via: hackerone975 @ gm a i l com .
Anonymous
01 November 2022 at 09:54
Dear Sir/Mam,
In my residential society, earlier it was a IBMS but from 2016, Builder change it into IFMS means before 2016 sell out flat has IBMS and after 2016 sold out flat has IFMS now there is two types of fund in one society even if someone want to transfer his flat to other (via sell) then forcefully Builder changed it to IFMS. IS this legal as per RERA or not can any builder run two rules in one society.
Note- Few Person in this forum like Mr. Rajendra Kumar Goyal is giving a very fake advice so I request him not to give his advice, Some time he simply say file consumer complaint, Everyone knows it but before consumer complaint it is just evaluation so please stay away with this post.
Member Strength 9,51,953 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Redevelopment of society building
We have more than 80% written concent duly signed by the society members for redevelopment. As few members are working abroad or out of the state their physical presence in the SGM is not possible. Therefore 75% attendence in the SGM is not possible. Is it mandatory that they must be present in the SGM? Can we place their written concent in the SGM and add them in the majority in their absence and proceed with SGM? Is the decision taken by the members present in the SGM in this regard will be valid and treated as legal in the court of law? Our building is 35 years old and lot of leakages both externally and internally. Structural Audit Report is awaited.
PLEASE GUIDE.