Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

i p c

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 28 May 2010 This query is : Resolved 
Complainant mr x admitted in the complain that while he was going to the his work on that time mental dashed with the Honda of his and the Honda was his father’s name complainant mr x took at hospital him during the treatment the mental died. So as per law the mr x will become the accused and complaiant and in the chargeseet it showed in the said there is no any eye witness.

Now technical question is that in the report of the P S O the name is shown another persons means the name of the mr x comes but the name of father and surname comes differ and address different.
And in the statements of the complainant the name is shown another persons means the name of the mr x comes but the name of father and surname comes differ and address different. But my client says that there is his signature under the statement but the statements in gujarati and he does not know the gujarati language
Which kind of the defence can be taken place pls suggest regards
Surrender K Singal (Expert) 28 May 2010
Whiling obtaining signatures the recording PSO would generally write that the statement (in gujrati) has been read over and accepted correct (ROAC) by the signatory, which can still be challanged as having signed under threat / duress etc.
But, the real facts should always prevail if persisted with !
Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 28 May 2010
I do agree with Sinal.
Uma parameswaran (Expert) 29 May 2010
It can be challenge.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :