Know about sec52 in labour law

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 25 June 2020 This query is : Resolved
How many sec 52 is applicable in the year

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 25 June 2020
Vague query without any reference/ facts / problem.

Even does not look like an examination question.

Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 25 June 2020
Section 52 can be from a large no. of State and Central Acts in force. In which reference the query relates.

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 25 June 2020
What are the facts leading to raise the said query?

Dr J C Vashista (Expert) 26 June 2020
Neither any facts nor specific question is posted for taking the examination qua Section 52 of any particular Act.

Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 26 June 2020
Author is calm / seem not interested to provide facts of the problem if any.

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 26 June 2020
It is highly surprising that one of the experts has treated the query thrice as of now and still author is silent?

Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 26 June 2020
waiting for any initiation / information from the author.
Easy to comment on others without looking into own action.

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 26 June 2020
Have no other option but to wait. Haven't experts the mobile number of the author so that he may be got invited here??

Guest (Expert) 26 June 2020
Once again makkar is back with his drowsy comments as if Mr.Rajendra K Goyal. is in search of Clients here. Several Occasion Mr.Rajendra K Goyal had stated clearly that he will not be attending the cases due to his various personal reasons. He had confirmed it openly in several threads. Mr.Goyal is here only to help and guide the needy Querist here which he renders as an Honorary Service. The Person who had commented about him had exposed his own Cheap Mentality and Behavior.

Rajendra K Goyal (Expert) 26 June 2020
Understanding the taunting language from the expert regarding mobile no.

There can be hundred comments in response to such taunt.

Preferred not to comment.

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 26 June 2020
None has indicated the name of any particular expert except one known to everybody here. What is the use to write again and again that the author has not responded? Everybody can read that author has not responded but with intent to stretch maximum posts, is it mandatory to use a new thread that author has not responded?

Anyways, I have no ill-will against anybody and if anyone feels offended by my joke and has taken it personal then I feel apology from that particular expert but he should also take my suggestion in right way to which many experts time and again have shown their displeasure.

None is here to charge anything from any author in even private life. This is not the prerogative of a single expert. Can anybody prove that I invited anybody to my office or took any case of him on the basis of our Hon'rary contribution here since the day I became active here?

Ik cehre pe kai chehre lga lete hain log.........

Guest (Expert) 27 June 2020
" Always Speak the Truth Or some one else would tell it for you " -- Stephanie Kiein.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries

Know about sec52 in labour law

Download LCI APP

Our Network Sites