Objecting to construct a fence/any thing at home

Manju (Querist) 17 January 2016 This query is : Resolved
In 1940, 6 members(lets say A,B,C,D,E,F) jointly purchased 1.05 AC land in Andhra Pradesh, India for construction of homes. In 1945, Among all, 3 members(A,B,D) exchanged their share with another 1 person(lets say G, who have land near to that place but in another survey number:proof for this is 2 exchange deeds between 1. B,D & G, 2. A & G with out mentioning any boundaries in A,B,D share).

After that, 2 members E(12 cents),F(12 cents+3 cents purchased land from C with boundaries) are enjoying
the land adjacently. The new person G (who have 3 persons share) sold remaining(don't know exactly how much but some vacant place is there) land to some other persons.

There is no partition deed among all 6 members.
C and his legal heirs don't possess any enjoyment in this number.

C legal heirs have their family partition deed mentioning 12 cents share in this land with out mentioning any boundaries.

F donated his 15(12+3 cents purchased from C) cents land to his son-in-law with mentioning boundaries,this person have 50 years enjoyment.

Now, C legal heirs objecting that my share comes here only hence don't construct anything here at F share place. Your share(F share) not come here, your share is at end of this land why because F is last person in deed. Is it true? Is there any law stating like that? Who need to go to vacant land either C legal heirs or F's son-in-law?

How can son-in-law of F construct any thing like fence/toilet etc in F mentioned land? Actually, 17.5 cents is share per one person. But, either E or F don't have 17.5 cents. F have 17.5+3= 20.5 cents but he he possessed 15 cents only. Lets say variation may be roads etc.
How C legal heirs objects F son-in-law? (All 6 members+ G also are passed away and their grand sons are alive now.)

Follow Query

Report Abuse

ROHIT SHARMA (Expert) 18 January 2016
1. This is quite a write up and though i have read it over and over i still have not got to the know as you are involved in this scenario.
2. The legal heirs of C have no claim as F has had bought his share.
3. But this sort of conveyance of land by A B & D to the neighbor land owner without any partition then this whole distribution of land has been done unlawfully and any of the legal heirs of such six ancestors can challenge F's son in law constructing such fencing and toilet in the assumed land of F.
4. I can be of more help if you can opt to have a phone consultation with me provided you are willing to remunerate a moderate sum chargeable for 30 minutes duration index.
5. Click my name shown in the margin of this reply format and get my contact details.