Interpretation of the operational part of judgement
Guest
(Querist) 15 September 2012
This query is : Resolved
Divisional Bench gave this judgement in a special appeal filed for the recruitment of physiotherapists in uttarakhand.
We, accordingly, allow the appeal and modify the
judgment and order under appeal by upholding the quashing of
concerned merit list of Physiotherapists prepared by the Board, but at
the same time, direct the Board to reject all those examinees, who
appeared in the examination for being appointed as Physiotherapists,
but not received 30% marks in diploma examination and to complete
the selection of Physiotherapists by adding to the marks obtained by
the fit examinees in the written examination, 30% marks for
intermediate examination and 70% marks for diploma / degree
examination. Let the said exercise be completed as quickly as
possible, but not later than two months from the date of service of a
copy of this order upon the Board.
Sir i want your help to interpret this judgement.please reply,thanks
i have attached the whole judgement for refrence.
ajay sethi
(Expert) 15 September 2012
1)court has granted 5 months time to board to complete the merit list .
2) the merit list finalised by board for appointment of physitherapists has been quased .
3)all physiotherapists who did not receive 30%marks in diplma exams are rejected .
4) in respect of those who had received 30%marks in diploma exams and who had cleared written exams court has directed to add 30%marks for interm ediate exams and 70%marks for diploma/degree examination
Guest
(Querist) 15 September 2012
Sir,
the main part is that who are cleared i.e. fit examinees in written exam
ajay sethi
(Expert) 15 September 2012
read para 4 of my answer . it deals with fit examinees ie those who got 30%,marks in diploma exams .
Guest
(Querist) 15 September 2012
but sir diploma exams was acedemic and the written exam was for state competition level.
