Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Discharge under s.239 of crpc

(Querist) 27 January 2012 This query is : Resolved 
hello sir

fir loadge of s. 143, 323, 332 of ipc.
In fir accused name is RAMANBHAI MOHANBHAI SONI but accused real name is RAMANBHAI SURESHBHAI SONI he was not present when offence was commited he said he is innocent.

police arrested RAMANBHAI SURESHBHAI SONI Insted of RAMANBHAI MOHANBHAI SONI.

police chargshited RAMANBHAI@MOHANBHAI@SURESHBHAI SONI.

Number of three witness said on his statement they saw RAMANBHAI MOHANBHAI SONI when offence happen.

ONLY DIFFERENT OF FATHER NAME

SO MY QUESTION IS THAT ACCUSED CAN DISCHARGE FROM THIS SECTION ?

ANY CITATION RELATED MY QUERY ?
Advocate. Arunagiri (Expert) 27 January 2012
Name is not at all a matter. Whether the witness identify the accused. That is very important.
DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g (Expert) 27 January 2012
Defense has always limitless scope, may be you are real accused but police took your name wrongly.

BUT Yes file discharge and contest it, go in revision on this issue alone.
Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 28 January 2012
Nothing seems to be added in the wise advice of experts.
V R SHROFF (Expert) 28 January 2012
no need to add more.
Shailesh Kr. Shah (Expert) 28 January 2012
if both name have single person, no remedy is available. otherwise prove it that both are different.
prabhakar singh (Expert) 29 January 2012
wisely advised by experts.
Shonee Kapoor (Expert) 29 January 2012
I endorse the considered views.

Regards,

Shonee Kapoor
harassed.by.498a@gmail.com


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :