BASIC LEGAL QUERY

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 03 July 2011 This query is : Resolved
WHETHER POSITION UNDER HINDU LAW AND CPC 50,52,58 RELATING TO PIOUS DUTY OF SON AND EXTENT OF SON LIABILITY IS DIFFERENT AND WHAT IS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HINDU LAW AND CPC SECTION 50,52,53, WHETHER HINDU LAW WILL APPLY OR CPC WHEN CASE IS RELATING TO PIOUS DUTY. WHERE IS HINDU LAW WRITTEN .CAN U TELL ME SOURCE.I THINK ITS NOT CODIFIED .TELL IN REFRENCE TO POSITION PRIOR TO YEAR 2005 BECAUSE PIOUS CONCEPT ABOLISHED BY GOVT AFTER 2005

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Ravikant Soni (Expert) 03 July 2011
It is abolished in referance as to Ancestral property only. In case property devovled under section 8 then PIOUS liability exists.

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 03 July 2011
IT EXIST TO EXTENT OF PROPRTY INHERITED BY SON FROM FATHER ONLY AND SELF ACQUIRED PROPERTY OF SON NOT LIABLE AS PER SEC50,52,53 OF CPC.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now