Dear Expert
1. We have received 12 cheques against the 4 invoices and all 12 cheques deposited at one time and after bounced one composite note has been sent ..
2. Further to that Party came and issued letter and Signed Settlement Agreement
3. Now one Complaint for all 12 cheques have been filed in the Court
4. Now Court is of the Veiw that as per section 218 , 209 and 220 this Complaint is not maintainable as we can file the complaint with maximum 3 similar offence together, since transection is different hence this complaint is not maintainable
Kindly advise with judgment so that we could save this complaint.
With Regards
Uday Kumar
Dear Expert,
I have filed one Complaint U/s 138 of NI Act against 12 cheques issue by the Accused against 4 invoices of the Complainant.
Accused duly confirmed the issuance of cheques on letter head and even signed Mutual Agreement as well.
All 12 cheques bounced together against which one Composite Legal Notice was issued and accordingly 1 complaint has been filed but Magistrate say Complainant is not in accordance of Section 218 CrPC ,219 CRPC ,220 CrPC hence not maintainable
Please help with some judgment if I can maintain such complaint
With Regards
Uday Kumar
Sir,
perjury application u/s 195-340 was filed with prayer send it to Sho police FIR etc.
After evidence and my statement etc. Court ordered on next date arguments on summoning,
No order passed on our prayer of send application complaint to SHO police for FIR etc..,
Is it correct lawful proceedings, ???, Court need to pass speaking, reasoned order, for not sending to police for FIR..please advise...
We have employed a caretaker in our bungalow in Khandala for the past 25 years. Despite repeated requests to the caretaker, he and his family refuse to vacate our premises. Kindly advice as to what stand should we take to evict him from our bungalow
Our Housing Society is undergoing Redevelopment. As per DA, building was to be demolished after all the existing members are put in Permanent Alternate Accommodation by constructing a tower in the open space available and then construct another tower for sale by the Developer. However the Developer decided to construct both towers together and asked the existing members to vacate their flats, which the members agreed on promise of getting hardship compensation on monthly basis for arranging temporary Alternate Accommodation in lieu of putting into possession on Permanent Alternate Accommodation as per DA. All members have been getting compensation regularly for 7/8 years without any further documentation. From Feb 2020 the Developer is paying to the members who are paying on rent and have given them L&L agreement copies. Some of the Members are staying with their children, but are not being paid compensation by Developer. We feel it is discrimination and injustice to such Members. This is hardship compensation to displaced persons and not disbursement of rent paid. Most of such Members are senior citizens without any source of regular income. Please advise the action to be taken by such discriminated members to get JUSTICE in the matter. Regards.
Our Housing Society is undergoing Redevelopment. As per DA, building was to be demolished after all the existing members are put in Permanent Alternate Accommodation by constructing a tower in the open space available and then construct another tower for sale by the Developer. However the Developer decided to construct both towers together and asked the existing members to vacate their flats, which the members agreed on promise of getting hardship compensation on monthly basis for arranging temporary Alternate Accommodation in lieu of putting into possession on Permanent Alternate Accommodation as per DA. All members have been getting compensation regularly for 7/8 years without any further documentation. From Feb 2020 the Developer is paying to the members who are paying on rent and have given them L&L agreement copies. Some of the Members are staying with their children, but are not being paid compensation by Developer. We feel it is discrimination and injustice to such Members. This is hardship compensation to displaced persons and not disbursement of rent paid. Most of such Members are senior citizens without any source of regular income. Please advise the action to be taken by such discriminated members to get JUSTICE in the matter. Regards.
Hi - we are selling a flat in Nahur Mumbai. The bak has told the buyer to get collector NOC from us as the building is on collector's land, however our builder has confirmed it is freehold land. We went through the property card for the plot and it was category 'C' . Does this mean freehold land ? How can we read and confirm for property card.
I am a landlord rented out my shop to a tenant. He had defaulted in payment of rent. I had filed a case for eviction on the ground of self occupation and default in rent. Meanwhile, the tenant has also filed a separate suit for deposit of rent in the court a year ago. I was not aware of the suit filed by the tenant. I had furnished my bank a/c. details to the tenant to deposit the rent directly into my account till the case of eviction filed by me. The tenant has also deposited the rent directly into my account. Now I got the summon for the suit filed by the tenant. The summon was delayed due to corona lock down. As the tenant is already paying rent into my account, do I have to respond the summon? What further step I have to take on the suit filed by the tenant?
Thanks in advance.
In commercial apartment do we need to pay maintenance charges every month, even if specific amt is not mentioned in agreement bt we are giving specific amt, even wen their was no issues, after paying water and diesel expenses separately..is it required to pay the charge where I m not using lift¿
Sale deed by authorized person's representativel
Sir
A Pvt. Ltd. Company authorized a person to execute a sale deed and that person issued a special power of attorney for that person to another person. Whether sale deed executed by that person is valid.