H. Mujtaba
06 March 2009 at 17:21
Suit for perfecting the titile by Adverse Possession is filed against 5 defendants. Summons issued to defendants 3 and 4 was returned with an endorsement that the said defendatns have died even prior to the institution of the suit.
What is the remedy in such circumstances to the plaintiff, either to invoke order 22 rule 4 or Orer 1 Rule 10 Read with section 153 of C.P.C to bring the legal representatives of the deceased defendants on record
REEBI JOSE
06 March 2009 at 12:51
Dear Sirs,
Is there any restriction in employing contract labourers for continuous process operations under the contract labour abolition act.
Thanking you
reebi
REEBI JOSE
06 March 2009 at 12:50
Dear Sirs,
Is there any restriction in employing contract labourers for continuous process operations under the contract labour abolition act.
Thanking you
reebi
Zia
06 March 2009 at 11:36
I am interested to know that whether PF code is required by Gram Panchayat for getting the work executed through them or they being local self government bodies are exempted from PF Act.
Zia
06 March 2009 at 11:36
I am interested to know that whether PF code is required by Gram Panchayat for getting the work executed through them or they being local self government bodies are exempted from PF Act.
Zia
06 March 2009 at 11:35
I am interested to know that whether PF code is required by Gram Panchayat for getting the work executed through them or they being local self government bodies are exempted from PF Act.
Sultan Salauddin Khan
06 March 2009 at 11:35
If a warrant of arrest has been issued by Judicial Magistrate in a case against the accused person but concerned police officer is not executing the said WA. What step should be taken by the JM
Sultan Salauddin Khan
06 March 2009 at 11:28
A petition/FIR filed with CJM under section 156(3) can be denied by the CJM on any ground. IS Sending of information /FIR necessary to the concerned SP through Regd. post.
monica
06 March 2009 at 10:08
My husband (Indian citizen) and myself (US citizen) have adopted a baby from the birth parents directly under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act. We are now staying in India with our baby for 2 years after which time we will be applying for immigration with our child.
My question is regarding the actual adoption per HAMA...is this recognized as a full and final adoption per Indian law? We did satisfy all the conditions under HAMA, ie: Hindu, no children, did handing over ceremony.
The adoption deed was signed by both birth parents as well as by my husband and myself and was registered with the sub-registrar.
Do we still need a court order? My understanding is that court order is for cases where the guardianship of the child is not with the birth parent which was not the case here.
Any advice would be welcomed regarding the legality of this adoption in the eyes of the Indian legal system.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
coopratve law in maharashtra
if any coopratvive bank is merged in multi state co op. bank - what is effect on pending disputes u/s. 91 and proceeding u/s.101 of maharastra co-op. socities act,1960.
(in maharashtra)