The hp tenancy and land reforms act 1972

Chetan (Querist) 06 October 2026 This query is : Resolved
Dear Experts
Greetings for the Day!

This discussion concerns an application for mutation attestation under Section 104(3) of the Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972.

The applicant, a non-occupancy tenant, faced delays when the Tehsildar required addresses for other parties, who had long since left the area. Despite a public notice (proclamation) in the Gazette stating proceedings would be ex-parte if no objections were filed, the court granted further extensions, raising concerns about procedural fairness and potential delays. The applicant seeks guidance on navigating the Tehsildar's court to secure justice and proprietary rights.

Is there a statutory provision to give/favor another month period to other party dispite of the fact it was clearly mentioned in the Govt. Gazette as under

...........matter shall be proceeded with ex-parte against the non-appearing respondents/persons [on the mentioned date] and further proceedings shall be taken in accordance with law without any further notice..........

But there after again giving one month period to other party to raise objections, insted of passing proper order though the date was fixed for passing proper order.

Regards

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Quick Summary

This discussion focuses on a mutation attestation application under the Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972. A non-occupancy tenant is experiencing significant delays due to the Tehsildar requiring addresses for absent parties, despite a public notice indicating ex-parte proceedings. The applicant is seeking advice on how to proceed and ensure a fair resolution to obtain proprietary rights.

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Expert) 06 October 2026
You have repeated the same query in the forum section, you may visit that thread to know more opinions

Dr. J C Vashista (Expert) 07 October 2026
Repetition of same story shall not change the opinion and advise of experts, however, it is ridiculous.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries