The hp tenancy and land reforms act 1972
Chetan 
(Querist) 06 October 2026
This query is : Open
Dear Experts
Greetings for the Day!
This discussion concerns an application for mutation attestation under Section 104(3) of the Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972.
The applicant, a non-occupancy tenant, faced delays when the Tehsildar required addresses for other parties, who had long since left the area. Despite a public notice (proclamation) in the Gazette stating proceedings would be ex-parte if no objections were filed, the court granted further extensions, raising concerns about procedural fairness and potential delays. The applicant seeks guidance on navigating the Tehsildar's court to secure justice and proprietary rights.
Is there a statutory provision to give/favor another month period to other party dispite of the fact it was clearly mentioned in the Govt. Gazette as under
...........matter shall be proceeded with ex-parte against the non-appearing respondents/persons [on the mentioned date] and further proceedings shall be taken in accordance with law without any further notice..........
But there after again giving one month period to other party to raise objections, insted of passing proper order though the date was fixed for passing proper order.
Regards
