Anonymous
10 May 2010 at 08:36
A lodges a complaint with police against B for putting up an unauthorized hut on A's land. In the police enquiry, B denies that he has got anything to do with the hut. The enquiry is closed accordingly. Later on A removes the hut on his land. Now, C files a complaint with the same police against A for dismantling his hut, claiming as owner of the said land. Now is 'A''s act illegal under IPC or any other law. In an earlier title suit between the predecessors' in title of A and C, the decision was given by a civil court in favour of A's predecessor's in title in an exparte decree. Till date the exparte decree has not been set aside. Can the title issue again be agitated by the successors in title.?
anshul sangal
10 May 2010 at 08:02
Can revision be made on appeallat court other than high court if yes then under which provision?
Sir What is "Devis method" for considering multiplier to calculate compensation under MV act.
Anonymous
10 May 2010 at 00:54
Sir,
A person has obtained an order of Circle Officer with submitting fake document and Circle officer too has colluded with him and has manipulated entire order sheet, in one date CO (Circle officer) has put signature on that date even he was not posted here. Does this come under cheating or any other criminal section? Is documentary evidence is sufficient or any other evidence is reqd.?
Thanks and regds.
Anonymous
10 May 2010 at 00:51
Hello dear friends,
A and B jointly enter into a sale agreement of their lands to C. The terms of agreement tell that C shall pay advance of 2 lakhs and within 3 months time he should register the sale by paying the balance amount.
Meantime, C advances some more money to B without the knowledge of A beyond the agreement date and keeps on postphoning for final payment for more than 2 years. The said advanced amounts are acknowledged by B on the back of the sale agreement. One such receipt was acknowledged after the final date of agreed date for finalisation.
After 2 years A and B jointly execute a sale of the said lands to D, since C failed to honour his committment.
Now, the endorsement (acknowledgement of receipt of amount by B) beyond the sale agreement time i.e., 3 months will give any fresh lease of time to C?
And what remedy C has got to get his money back from B?
Thank you all in advance.
nandkishor sakorkar
10 May 2010 at 00:49
Sir. please let me know "Can you specify city/state where-from candidate should apply in the advertisement to be published for recruitment by the company", in as much what are the code of ethics for publishing advertisement for recruitment as per constitution of our country.
please email me your comets on my email i.d.
sakorkar_nr@yahoo.co.in
My son Syed Abuthahir @ Aurangabad submitted his online passport Application Registration No.BOM I04190710SA1031, dt.31.01.10. The application along with fee of Rs.1000/- and other documents was sent through courier and received on 10.03.10 in the o/o the Regional Passport Officer, Mumbai. Acknowledgement was received. So far neither file number nor any reply was received from there. Several emails were sent to the RPO, Mumbai and Chief Passport Officer, New Delhi regarding the issue. On 23.04.10 it was informed through phone that the application was lost. Immediately the matter was taken to the notice of the RPO and CPO concerned through email. No reply was received from them. On 03.05.10 information was saught under the RTI Act. Please give suitable instruction regarding this matter.
charanjeet singh
09 May 2010 at 20:52
Is complaint of dishounoured cheque with endorsement 'signature differ' is maintainable U/S 138?
If yes, any authority regarding this?
sec 138
I AM BEING ASKED TO STAND AS A WITTNESS IN A CASE FOR THE ACCUSED WHERE HE IS BEING ACCUSED FOR DISHONOURING OF POST DATED CHEQUES.
WHAT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY. DO I HAVE TO PAY UP THE MONEY IN CASE HE DOES NOT?
DO I HAVE TO APPEAR EVERYTIME HE IS SUMMONED?
IN CASE HE DISAPPEARS , WHAT IS MY LIABILITY .
WHAT HAPPENS TO ME IN CAS HE DOES NOT APPEAR FOR A COURT SUMMON