Anonymous
12 July 2026 at 15:19
Hi. My parents are extremely worried about this, I would appreciate alot any guidance. There was a land owned by a guy which was given to him through gram panchayat about 30-40 yrs ago. Since then the land has been sold through GPA(power of attorney) to multiple people. My parents recently bought this land with literally all their life savings. Now since the new GPA rules rules out by delhi govt my parents are extremely worried what will happen and either they own the land or not. I know gpa isn't owning a land but well the clauses include everything in the GPA.
SOME DETAILS:
The seller and my parents both are the same village residents.
The land is under lal dora
We have all the documents of all seller and buyers till today.
Please give some good news. We are stressing over here. If it's a issue please tell us what we can do now.
Nikhil chaudhary
09 July 2026 at 23:23
In my case before the Haryana appellate court, the civil appeal was dismissed in default, and the appellant has filed a restoration application within limitation. Is the respondent's advocate required to obtain and file a fresh Vakalatnama to appear in the restoration proceedings, or can the advocate continue on the basis of the original Vakalatnama already on record? If the restoration application is handled by same advocate, who handled the main appeal, Then again the sign of respondent is needed in vakalatnama?
Ka19@7567
09 July 2026 at 11:20
i have a single 3 bedroom flat with two door numbers in sale deed registered given possession by builder during occupation . i have paid single maintainance since occuoation one year to builder & 4 years to association also .
now association is asking for doublr maintainance ? i have a single electric meter since my occuoation .
what wil b the problems for future inclding legal issues from corporation
Jasvinder
06 July 2026 at 21:38
A pvt ltd company have 2 director.
One director on behalf of company filed a injuction suit in civil court against me.
After much up and down in one other case between these 2 director of company one director other than who file injuction, given statement in high court that he had given resignation long back before this injuction suit and this director had no Locus standi to sue on behalf of pvt ltd company and this director who resign never stand in this injuction suit before the court.
When I came to know this I file o7r11 that this director had no locus standi to file any case in absence of resolution of board of director as Corum is not complete because of one director resignation and because of this no meeting can held and no resolution can be passed.
Am I right at this point.
Any case law.
Thanks in advance.
Anonymous
26 June 2026 at 19:21
My neighbour has put the big, lightening religious board above his door ,on common hallway wall. Is that legal. Can I object it legally.
Preetam Banerjee
25 June 2026 at 14:39
I have been selected for a Civil Engineering post under the Government of West Bengal and am currently awaiting appointment, subject to completion of Police Verification (PVR).
In 2021, my sister filed an IPC 306 case against me, my mother, and her former husband following a family dispute after my father's death. The case remained pending before the trial court for several years without significant progress.
Subsequently, all parties reached a mutual settlement and jointly approached the High Court seeking quashing of the criminal proceedings. A joint compromise petition has already been filed. However, due to procedural delays, including delay in production of the Case Diary by the State and other court-related reasons, the quashing petition is still pending.
I honestly disclosed the pending case in my PVR form and did not suppress any information. My PVR report is expected to reach the department shortly and will likely mention the case as pending. I made every possible effort to have the matter resolved before completion of the PVR process, but the delay was beyond my control.
I seek legal advice on whether this pending IPC 306 case, despite the compromise and pending quashing proceedings, may affect my government appointment and what legal remedies are available to protect my candidature and secure joining.
N S PRASAD
24 June 2026 at 17:59
RESPECTED SIR / MADAM
AM I STAYING 1977 TO TILL DATE SAME PLACE SUB REGISTER OFFICE ISSUED (1977) DOCUEMTNS HOUSE
PAYING REGULARLY PROPERTY TAX / ELECTRICITY TAX / WATER TAX
RIGHT NOW SACHIVALAYAM VRO SAYING YOUR HOUSE NOT SHOWING OUR GPS / GEDDA SITE
APPROCHED MRO / SACHIVALAYAM
OK SIR RIGHT NOW AP GOVERNMENT RELEASED 301 / 45 / 30 / 22A GOS FOR REGULARIZING LAND DOCUMENTS
BUT THEY PEOPLE SAYING YOU ARE NOT ELIGIBLE . NEXT NOTIFICATION WILL BE CAME WE CAN INTIMATING
LAST DATE TO APPLY SACHIVALAYAM ONLIONE 30-06-2026
KINDLY GIVE ME GUIDENCE
Anonymous
23 June 2026 at 23:18
what is the bathamam maktha lands defination in nizam state hyderabad post1954 acts and rules explain in detail if any body knows about this
Sankarlal Agrawalla
15 June 2026 at 23:24
I booked a flat. Paid to builder 40% of the flat cost. Requested the builder to register AFS to clear balance dues 60% by obtaining home loan. Builder non acted on my request. He cancelled my allotment siting reason of non payment and forfeited 10% of flat amount, GST amount and overdue interest. Subsequently sold my flat to another buyer by registering AFS to enjoy the appreciation value of the flat. What remedies available to me in getting my flat back?
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Two cheques having same liability
A person gives Rs. 1.23 crore amount to company for purchase of Plots. Plots were not sold to complainant so, complainant demanded his given money back. Two persons as authorised signatory/properietor gave 1-1 cheque of different bank account of same name companies' cheques as 1 crore and 50 lakh rupees respectively. The 1 crore cheque is given in sept. 2024 by first person. The 50 lacs cheque given in Nov. 2025 by second person. The second person had handover the firm to first person in September 2024. And the second person has remained the firm on same name as before. The cheque of 1 crore has been returned and a complaint under section 138 of the negotiable instrument act filed against first accused person for Rs. 1 crore amount as written in cheque in court by mentioning that “Rs. 1.03 (in figure and in words) amount was paying by complainant to accused (legally debt) for that the accused has given cheque for Rs. 1 crore.” The calculation found at that time is Rs. 1.03 crore But, the real calculation found after filing complaint is Rs. 1.23 crore. Now, the complainat want to return the 50 lacs cheque given by other person. What amount of total debt the complainant can mention in demand notice given after return of 50 lacs cheque. Can he mention that the total debt of Rs. 1.23 crore with demanding 50 lacs as written on cheque amount in second demand notice or demand 23 lacs only against other accused person?
- Total amount of the two cheques (1 and 0.50) is Rs. 1.50 crore and legally debt is Rs. 1.23 crore.
- Amount shown in first notice and complaint is 1.03 crore but acturally is Rs. 1.23 crore. can do any amentment in complaint? what other remedy? Can not effect on legality of demant notice ?
- The amount of 1 crore not received back to complainant yet.