Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Bhrigu Gera   30 March 2009 at 11:06

mineral water bottle sold above MRP in Hotel and Restaurant

I would like to seek guidance with regards to selling of mineral water bottle above MRP which may range from 12- 15 rs MRP and sold anything between 35-40 rs. this selling of products is in contravention of the consumer protection act. is this is a valid groung to file a complaint in consumer court? however there is judgement by delhi high court in the case of THE FEDERATION OF HOTELS & RESTAURANTS ASSOCIATIONOF INDIA & ORS. i the year 2007, month march, which entails that the hotels and restaurant can sell above MRP.Will the provisions of weights and measure act apply also? Please advice on this issue. waiting for promt reply. Thanks in advance.

ess oberoi   29 March 2009 at 17:43

Copies of Judgments

ashis   29 March 2009 at 16:28

contract law

every one invited
sir as a student please clearify folloings (i am totally confused with given explainations):
1.under consideration:::
what does it mean that a- The promisee must suffer legal detriment
b- detriment must induce promise c- the promise must induce the detriment


2- WHAT IS motive and past consideration
3- WHAT IS sham and nominal consideration
exceptions
regards (KINDLY TELL ME A SITE IN WHICH MATTERS REGARDING CONTRACTS ARE GIVEN )
ashis

ess oberoi   29 March 2009 at 10:48

copy of judgment

I want the following two judgments :-
(a) Islamia Academy of Education & Anr Vs State of Karnataka & Ors (2003) 6 SCC 697
(b)Ghaziabad Development Authority Vs Balbir Singh (2004) 5 SCC 65
Can you guide me ? Where Can I get free judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and Hon'ble High Courts etc. ?

vinod bansal   28 March 2009 at 21:04

evidentary value of a photocopy of affidavit,

R/All
Sir
what is evidentary value of a photocopy of an affidavit in consumer forum which original is not available.

prateek saxena   26 March 2009 at 11:45

rent agreement again (urgent)(prateek)

respected all sir,
as all of u told me abut section 17 or 18 of indian registration act,1899, but in the section or clause 35 of the said act, said that the amount of stamp duty upto 1 year is 4%.

wht its means, u said no requirement of stamp duty payable upto 1 years.

i go through all section of this , but nothing found under more reference.

Actually, case is that

(1) i have a mall in noida, and i lot a
portion of shop to a party as rent.
(2) they wnt to enter into rent
agreement for 11 months on Rs 150/- w/o stamp duty pay.

so, pls advice me for this situation.

and if possible, plz provide any circular related to non payment of stamp duty for 11month rent agreemnt. as i think , it is good defence for me.


please advice me.



mehul dave   26 March 2009 at 08:51

consumer protaction act

one mr. A has a mediclaim policy of himself and his wife too in a insurance co. mr. A donated his kidney to his wife and put the claim for himself and for his wife. insurance co. did not pass the claim for mr. A but passed entire claim for his wife only. it is the say of the company that claim doesnot pass for a donor of an organ. in the insurance policy nowhere mentioned that company is not liable for any claim of the insured person for donating organ. mr.A went for ombudsment. but there also his claim was not passed. My question is that can mr. A go for consumer protection act? Is it necessary for mr. A to give legal notice before going for consumer protaction act?

Member (Account Deleted)   23 March 2009 at 13:05

Right to Practice

If after completing LLB one has enrolled himself as Advocate, but subsecuently joined in a full time LLM course, can he continue to practice while doing LLM?

Dr.Gaurang N. Gandhi   23 March 2009 at 12:31

Weighbridge service tax

my client has started weigh bridge


In yr 2007-08 the annual income was apprp. 500000/-


howmuch service tax should he pay?

M. PIRAVI PERUMAL   23 March 2009 at 12:25

WHETHER SECTION 420 IPC ATTRACTS WHEN INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IS PENDING ?

One of my client has filed Insolvency Petition before the Court of Law, in which he has arrayed the persons from whom he received payments as advance for delivery of machines and also money lenders from whom he has borrowed money.

Now, one of the respondent in the insolvency proceedings has lodged a police complaint. The police has registered a case u/s 420 IPC against my client. Whether a case u/s 420 IPC can be made out when in the insolvency proceedings defacto complainant is respondent.
That my client has also revealed in the insolvency proceedings about the receipt of the amount.

Shall I file move HC for quashing the FIR ?
or
Shall I move for anticipatory bail ?

Expecting the valuable opinion of the learned experts.

Learned Experts kindly provide me any citations too in this regard. I am ready to provide any further clarifications required by the Learned Experts.