Basic question for lawyers
arijit singh
(Querist) 28 December 2014
This query is : Resolved
respected seniors,
I am law student, someone asked me a question and I am confused.I am asking the same question to you
" will you take any case of rape in which the person who commited the rape comes to you ans says you will you fight my case, and you also know that your client is at fault.
which option will you choose?
1. you will not take the case.
2. you will take the case, for the purpose of earning more and more from him.
3. you will take the case and cheat with that person.
4. your personal opnion.
will you fight the case knowing that all the fault is of your client.
What will you do ??
Guest
(Expert) 28 December 2014
In what way you are connected to this.Your Imaginary Queries I Prefer to Ignore.
R.K Nanda
(Expert) 28 December 2014
instead ask from ur law teacher.
Guest
(Expert) 28 December 2014
This is not a basic question for lawyers, but for yourself, how you take that after you complete your studies depending upon your own nature, whether you are emotional or sensible, generous or money-minded, honest or dishonest, etc.
So, better ask the question from yourself.
arijit singh
(Querist) 28 December 2014
PS Dhingra, sir i liked you opnion but suppose that person comes to you what will you do??
Guest
(Expert) 28 December 2014
Mr. Arijit,
First of all, I don't believe in suppositions like you. However, if you have any case pertaining to yourself, your friend or relative, you are welcome to come and discuss with me on payment of my initial consultancy fee for taking my time/advice, irrespective of whether I take up your case or not.
In fact your query is totally vague, if you ask question from me or any other individual. I have already pointed out, "This is not a basic question for lawyers". So, the question was put to you, which only you have to reply, what you have to decide on the issue.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 28 December 2014
This particular section of the site is not meant for such discussion.
ajay sethi
(Expert) 29 December 2014
you have to take the call whether you want to take such a case or not .
R.K Nanda
(Expert) 29 December 2014
first do ur law degree and do not waste time of experts.
arijit singh
(Querist) 29 December 2014
my question is if the persons who has done rape in nirbhaya's rape case comes to you for the help what will you do?
and please who thinks its waste of time then dont reply.
i have a genuine doubt which know one has answered.
malipeddi jaggarao
(Expert) 29 December 2014
Not a legal query. You cannot pose questions to the experts like this. If somebody asked you, you choose your reply and stop there.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 29 December 2014
This author should be boycotted in future.
Guest
(Expert) 29 December 2014
First attend some Good English Courses and Improve your Language.Your Last sentence in Last post "Which KNOW One has answered" can you explain the meaning.
Guest
(Expert) 29 December 2014
Mr. Arijit,
Your academic doubts should be got removed only through your class teachers. You should not have expected the experts here to have opened tutorial classes for students, like you.
The irony is, you are changing stance every time. At first, you asked that, as law student someone asked you a question and you are confused. Mind it, they asked YOU, not authorised you to seek answers from experts here, nor anyone of us is answerable to that "someone" through you.
Later, you asked me to suppose that person comes to me what will I do?? Even if they come to me, in what way you are concerned with their coming to me or consulting me and why I should have been answerable to you?
When your question was replied appropriately, you have now taken the plea in the name of "nirbhaya" and asked, "if the persons who has done rape in nirbhaya's rape case comes to you for the help what will you do?" Again my question is how you would be concerned and why yeou feel that anyone of us is answerable to you, if they come to anyone of us?
A pertinent question arises, with what right or authority you ask such a question from the experts. I have already replied, "if you have any case pertaining to yourself, your friend or relative, you are welcome to come and discuss with me on payment of my initial consultancy fee for taking my time/advice, irrespective of whether I take up your case or not." Could not you interpret my response to your question aimed at me?
Now you have stated, if those persons come to us, the same question arises, with what right or authority you can ask their question from any one of us, or you think us answerable to you? Let them come to any of us, they would get appropriate reply. OR else, you may also bring those persons to any of us to get reply of any of us before them. However, if you are so pertinent to know answer of anyone of us, why not you should pay the consultancy fee of that expert and know his views?
If as a law student, you have got some doubt, you are required not to go elsewhere, except your class teachers to remove your doubt, instead of unauthoritatively asking the experts, what they would do. The basic question was put to you only, what you will do", not what other would do? Are you such a dull-headed person that you can't understand that only you were made answerable to his question, whosover has put question to you.
Instead, when you said, "who thinks its waste of time then dont reply," you have gave vent to your sheer arrogance against the experts here, as if you are the boss or class teacher of the community members here to extract their answer to your vague question, somehow or the other.
BETTER BEHAVE LIKE A DISCIPLINED STUDENT, NOT LIKE A BOSS.
R.K Nanda
(Expert) 29 December 2014
agree with experts and such querist must be boycotted.
P. Venu
(Expert) 30 December 2014
Perhaps, the queriest would get the light from the following principle of David Hoffman:
"15. When employed to defend those charged with crimes of the deepest dye, and the evidence against them, whether legal or moral, be such as to leave no just doubt of their guilt, I shall not hold myself privileged, much less obliged, to use my endeavors to arrest or to impede the course of justice, by special resorts to ingenuity, to the artifices of eloquence, to appeals to the morbid and fleeting sympathies of weak juries, or of temporizing courts, to my own personal weight of character--nor finally, to any of the overweening influences I may possess from popular manners, eminent talents, exalted learning, etc. Persons of atrocious character, who have violated the laws of God and man, are entitled to no such special exertions from any member of our pure and honorable profession; and, indeed, to no intervention beyond securing to them a fair and dispassionate investigation of the facts of their cause, and the due application of the law. All that goes beyond this, either in manner or substance, is unprofessional, and proceeds, either from a mistaken view of the relation of client and counsel, or from some unworthy and selfish motive which sets a higher value on professional display and success than on truth and justice, and the substantial interests of the community. Such an inordinate ambition I shall ever regard as a most dangerous perversion of talents, and a shameful abuse of an exalted station. The parricide, the gratuitous murderer, or their perpetrator of like revolting crimes, has surely no such claim on the commanding talents of a profession whose object and pride should be the suppression of all vice by the vindication and enforcement of the laws. Those, therefore, who wrest their proud knowledge from its legitimate purposes to pollute the streams of justice and to screen such foul offenders from merited penalties, should be regarded by all (and certainly shall by me) as ministers at a holy altar full of high pretention and apparent sanctity, but inwardly base, unworthy, and hypocritcial--dangerous in the precise ratio of their commanding talents and exalted learning."
The queriest may find it worthwhile to visit http://lonang.com/commentaries/ curriculum/professional-deportment/ to have full understanding of the professional principles enunciated by David Hoffman.
arijit singh
(Querist) 30 December 2014
Mr. N.J.S.Rajkumar alias narasimha thanks sir for correcting
and sorry all for the misbehaver
PS Dhingra thank you
Guest
(Expert) 30 December 2014
I Really appreciate and all the best.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate
(Expert) 30 December 2014
Queries from such arrogant authors are not to be entertained at all. This is not the way if comes up with subsequent remarks on experts. First of all it is a vague academic query,secondly he is demanding it as a right which show his arrogance and scant respect to the experts here even at the stage of student itself. The bombarding and fitting reply by expert Mr. Dhingra is the proper solution to the author who will think about it before posting any query before any forum in future.
