quarry for relevancy of correspondence

satpal singh (Querist) 22 February 2010 This query is : Resolved
sir
Kindly consider the following to answeer--
Correspondence done prior to entering in to contract, in ref to provisions of bid, relating to detailed analysis of rates,duly responded by contractor,which formed the basis of acceptance of bid,has any significance or relevancy after entering in to agreement?
If so, any case-law references?
--satpal singh

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 22 February 2010
Contract is the only document which shall rely upon and correspondence held prior to that contract has no relevance at all except as reference.

B K Raghavendra Rao (Expert) 22 February 2010
After the series of correspondence, contract has been entered into. It is a mutual agreement and both the parties are bound by covenants in the agreement. Previous correspondence has no value.

Kumar Thadhani (Expert) 24 February 2010
Oral or verbally evidences or agreement and convenant has no relevancy or significance in law hence the corespondances prior to bid or contract has no values. Hence it is necessary that the parties should be bound by agreement or convenants.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now