fake DV ACT CASE
aman
(Querist) 12 May 2013
This query is : Resolved
respectd experts,
my eldr brothr's wife sent a notice through court undr DV act..but she dint make acuse her husband..although she is stayng with him separatly on rent..
Aftr her mariage she stayd on rent separtly bt for last few mnths she styd in our house .nw my brthr has sme property dispute so they pland all this..my qustion is that she wants to show her possession in our house and demanded .residnce order thru court..rite nw she is nt stayng in our house she is stayng wid her husbnd on rent bt she left her sme belongings in our house like bed,tv etc...and this property is exclusivly on my fathers name and his selfearnd..can she claim for rite to live in our house...what should we do with her belongings which she left in our house..our advocate is sayng that acording to the defintion of shard houshold she has rite to claim for residnce order bcz she styd in our house at sme point of tym..and he will ask revision for the filed case in court..plz clear this confusion...bcz supreme court has given a cnfusing defintion of shard houshold.
Raj Kumar Makkad
(Expert) 12 May 2013
The wife of your brother cannot claim any shared household in that house which exclusively belong to your father despite of verdict of Hon'ble Supreme Court to which you have indicated.
Devajyoti Barman
(Expert) 13 May 2013
No, she can not claim right in it. He right exists in property belonging to her husband only, not to any other family members.
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 13 May 2013
Her right under DV act is colourful, does not survive. Misuse of DV Act for property dispute is well noted, and unless she proves it to be her matrimonial home with shared household, her claim is invalid [only keeping few furniture does not create dv rights]
ajay sethi
(Expert) 13 May 2013
agree with experts she cannot claim any right in property belonging to her in laws
Shashikant V. Patil
(Expert) 13 May 2013
She has no right to ask her husband share's till her in-law survive or makes partition of joint HUF.
Guest
(Expert) 10 December 2014
Well attended
Anirudh
(Expert) 10 December 2014
SHAME ON THIS FELLOW TO ATTEND THIS ONE YEAR OLD QUERY.
HE IS TRYING ALL THESE GIMMICS TO HIDE HIS FALSE AND FRADULENT PROFILE.
This fellow cannot even be a last person one can consult for any advice.
This fellow is good for nothing. Many a times he gives advices which are not supported by law.
TAKE THIS FELLOWS FALSITY IN HIS PROFILE. THIS FELLOW ATTACHES MORE IMPORTANCE TO THE PROFILE, WHILE HE IS FILLING UP TOTAL FALSE HOOD IN HIS PROFILE.
please visit the following link:
http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/lawyers_search/N-J-S-Rajkumar-alias-narasimha-254519.asp#.VIcRwmeHPFx
where he claims that he is practising from 2001, while as already indicated by me, he was enrolled only in the year 2012!!! CAN ANYBODY PRACTICE BEFORE ENROLMENT? IF ONE DOES SUCH A PRACTICE IS HE NOT FIT TO BE CALLED A "FRAUD"?
N.J.S.Rajkumar alias narasimha's Details
Listed Under
Business Law
Civil Law
Criminal Law
Practicing Since
2001
Specialization
SEBI and SEBI RELATED CASES
Court
Others
Address
54,PARASURAMA EASWARAN KOIL WEST MADA STREET,AYANAVARAM,CHENNAI 600023
Other Details
rajkumar_wins@rediffmail.com 9444036927
Therefore, before taking advice, the querist should be too careful
