Strike
Raja
(Querist) 20 February 2012
This query is : Resolved
Right to Strike - how far correct?
Kirti Kar Tripathi
(Expert) 21 February 2012
law is available on this subject, search and go through
mahendrakumar
(Expert) 21 February 2012
what is your query?
right to strike where?
it depend upon the area of work.
if somebody is working in the armed forces,he/she has no right of strike there.
V R SHROFF
(Expert) 21 February 2012
Advocte Raja,
You and I know, ALL STRIKES ARE ILLEGAL.
workmen have no other weapon to fight against rich industrialist, who try to exploit them.
So All Labour Laws to protect them, and Workmen's UNION take advantage of this illegal weapon.
Now all ind have alternate mfg facility, so this weapon is blunt today. no sharp.
prabhakar singh
(Expert) 21 February 2012
These are topics of discussion for which posts should be made in forum section.
Raja
(Querist) 21 February 2012
Rule 4A of the Central Civil Services Conduct Rules 1955 reads: "No Government servent shall participate in any demonstration or resort to any strike in connection with any matter pertaining to his condition of service".
Article 33 of the Constitution provides that fundamental rights of the Armwd Forces, etc. can be abridged or abrogated by law, thus implying that fundamental rights of other government servants cannot be abridged.
Rule 4A was held to be valid so far as it referred to strikes, and void in so far as it referred to demonestrations because it violated the fundamental right of speech and expression.
In T.K.Rangrajan Vs. Govt. of Tamil Nadu the Supreme Court held that the government employees have no fundamental, legal, moral or equitable right to go on strike even for a just cause.
The position is somewhat anomalous!
EXPERTS OPINION SOLICITED . . .
