Civil suit on the father of my debtor

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 05 October 2011 This query is : Resolved
Respected sir,
A person who take a lone from me and give me cheques.but unfortunately he died unmarried during pendency of case.his legal heirs is his father,mother and two married sisters.he was a person who had a share in coparcenary property but now he is no more. so can i claim my money to his any legal heirs on basis of his property or any other ground .One expert told me that according to sec 229 of mulla's hindu Law in Principal of hindu law, after death of any coparcener other alive coparcener would get share of that coparcener as survivor not as successor and he told also that in any circumstances the survivor would not be responsible for any loan on cheque or any other sours get by died coparcener in his lifetime.he told if there any male issue is present in case than he would accountable for that but in my case after death of that person the alive coparcener is his father.(mother and two married sister are not a coparcener).and he get benefit of share of that person in the HUF property on the basis of survivor/the only alive coparcener.
Sir please tell that on which basis i will present my civil suit on his father for the recovery of my money on the ground of bounced cheque.is his father is responsible to pay the loan by his son in any circumstances. if any one known any order passed by any High court or Supreme Court Of India having similarities as my case,i would like to purchase that order.
Please Help me

Follow Query

Report Abuse

R.Ramachandran (Expert) 05 October 2011
You asked this query earlier also. Please go back to your original thread so that there will be continuity.

Raj Kumar Makkad (Expert) 05 October 2011
You have raised similar query for 5th time. You see here active experts are few one and almost all of them have already replied to your query so what is the use to raise similar query again and again before them. Try some other site if you are not satisfied with our earlier replies.

prabhakar singh (Expert) 05 October 2011
Yes i also view the matter as Mr. Ramachandran has viewed.

YOU ARE ADVISED TO MAINTAIN YOUR ORIGINAL THREAD.