Upgrad
LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

evidence of pw2

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 10 August 2010 This query is : Resolved 
pw chief evidence was filed but pw1 was not cross examined despite several opportunities by the defendents cousel after forfeiture respondents filed a petition for reopen which was dissmissed respondents never prefereed appeal then pw2 chief affidavit wass filed some unto ward incidents has happened where respondents have filed a petition for demarcation fo sy No's but to petitioners bad luck petitioners documents there was no mention that their sy No is falling in a common layout. during the pendency of the cross examination demarcation was done. but to the suprise of petitioners the petitioners have found their sy no is falling in common layout in some documents what is the fate of the demarcation . since the respondents have knowledge their sy no is in common layout. before finding the documents pw2 was corss examined what is the fate of the pw2 when the documents pertaining the petitioners sy.No is common layout which is laong withthe sy.No of the respondents.
Devajyoti Barman (Expert) 26 October 2010
The witness should be recalled to clear on that point.


You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .


Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries :






Course