Dr. MPS RAMANI Ph.D.[Tech.]
24 May 2026 at 12:04
How to transfer the ownership of a motor vehicle with the RTO on the death of the owner under the following circumstances.
1. The vehicle had an insurance as required under the Act and in the policy (a) the nominee had been specified. (b) no nominee had been specified or the nominee also is deceased.
2. There is a will covering all that the deceased owned without specifying the motor vehicle.
3. There is no will.
Maloji rao ghodkar
18 May 2026 at 17:39
The Registrar of Companies struck off the name of the company for failure of the Directors of the company in filing annual returns with the RoC. Whether the assets of the company both movable and immovable continue to vest with the company, what is the fate of them.
Maloji rao ghodkar
18 May 2026 at 17:32
The victim in digital arrest fraud transferred money to the mule account of the private bank and then reported the matter to the cyber police, who registered FIR and ordered for freezing of the amount lying in the mule account. By then some amount was withdrawn. The bank paid part of the amount to the victim but failed to remaining amount. The victim filed complaint with the District Consumer Commission against the bank seeking for refund of the remaining amount. The Commission raised object that the victim does not have privity of contract with the bank and complaint under the Consumer Protection Act is not maintainable. It was clarified that the amount transferred to the account of the bank is out of fraud and cheating and the tainted amount is required to be refunded to the victim. Any case law in support of the maintaining of the complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 please. Thanks
Celta Vallecano
14 May 2026 at 15:20
I’m at a loss for how to express this. My sister welcomed twin daughters in July and I found myself in a difficult financial and emotional state. I am known as Celta Vallecano and during my quest to find quick cash, I came across an advertisement claiming that Lord Meduza provides precise numbers to those genuinely selected for freedom from financial struggles through his genuine spell. I felt compelled to take a chance, and ever since reaching out to Lord Meduza, my life has significantly improved. As I write this, I am now a winner of €221 Million Euros after adhering to all the guidance and utilizing the MEGA MILLIONS numbers provided by Lord Meduza. I want to express my high gratitude for the fact that assistance is indeed possible to get regardless of how difficult your circumstances may seem. I highly recommend him in case you require any assistance, simply Email: lordmeduzatemple @ hotmail . com and for more inquiring visit: lordmeduzatemple.com
Anonymous
14 May 2026 at 13:21
Dear sir,
I have changed my daughter legal name through gazzette notification, she just passed ssc exam in this year result out online, original still not issued .
I want to know the legal status of gazzette notification can I change ssc marksheet and certificate through ssc board office directly.
Because school headmistress doesn't support for issue of LC with new name they asking as per old record they will issue LC.
And all onwards documents can apply with new name.
Pls reply your response is highly appreciated.
adv. rajeev ( rajoo )
12 May 2026 at 19:16
Any advocates from Kerala to file medical negligence case. I have to refer to my client. Please put the cell number
adv. rajeev ( rajoo )
12 May 2026 at 13:20
Dear Learned Members,
Legal notice u/s 138 of NI Act was served to the accused by hand. In my opinion it is valid service. But judge is not agreeing for that.
If any judgements regarding legal notice served by hand to the accused is valid service. Kindly let me know the judgements
Skanda
12 May 2026 at 06:43
I want to share my story. i purchased a flat for 63.63 lakhs spent 7 lakhs on registration 1 lakh on khata transfer and 20 lakhs on interior in ks layout Bangalore 560111 in 2017. i didn't have a car when purchasing a flat. There were 10 flats in the building. 8 are sold to outsiders. 2 are penthouse occupied by builder and his sons. Builder and sons have 6 cars and because I didn't have car they occupied my car parking and told me when I bring car they will vacate. Few months later i bought car but builder refused to vacate my spot. When I protested the builder and hiz sons beat me up and fractured my leg . My mother complained to ks layout police for ipc 307. Builder and sons false filed COUNTER COMPLIANT under ipc 307. The inspector told my mother that if they go ahead they will register both FIR as cross FIR. And then I would have to go to court to clear my name. Because I am A psu employee a s a govt servant FIR would mean suspension. So he advised and I withdrew my complaint and builder also withdrew his complaint. After I recovered i put the flat for resale but due to no resale market for standalone building in ks layout I sold it for just 56 lakhs as no buyers were available for my invested price of 90 lakhs. I suffered A massive 34 lacs loss. That is a harrowing experience, and it is deeply frustrating that a situation starting with a simple property right escalated into physical violence and a significant financial loss.
It is completely understandable why i felt backed into a corner regarding the police complaint. The threat of a "cross FIR" is a common, though highly manipulative, tactic used to exploit the professional stakes of government employees. Choosing to protect career and long-term stability in that moment was a survival decision, even if the outcome felt unjust.
Losing 34 lakhs is a staggering blow, especially after the physical and emotional trauma i endured. Many people underestimate the "builder-tenant" power dynamic in standalone buildings, where the lack of a formal Residents' Welfare Association (RWA) or professional security can leave individual owners vulnerable to this kind of bullying.
Moving Forward and Finding Closure
While the financial loss is heavy, there are a few perspectives that might help as i move past this chapter:
Safety Over Property: No amount of real estate is worth physical safety or life. By selling and leaving, i removed yourself from a toxic and dangerous environment where the "neighbors" had already proven they were willing to cause serious harm.
The "Peace of Mind" Dividend: While the math shows a 34-lakh loss, staying would have likely resulted in years of ongoing legal fees, medical bills, and the daily stress of living next to your attackers. Sometimes, cutting a loss is the only way to stop the "bleeding" of mental health.
A Hard Lesson in Due Diligence: my story serves as a powerful cautionary tale for others. It highlights why checking the parking layout, the ratio of cars to slots, and the reputation of a small-scale builder is just as critical as checking the title deeds.
It takes a lot of resilience to start over after being treated so unfairly
Skanda
12 May 2026 at 06:40
I saw your comment about your car parking situation in flat. I want to share smy story.i purchased a flat for 63.63 lakhs spent 7 lakhs on registration 1 lakh on khata transfer and 20 lakhs on interior in ks layout 560111 in 2017. Just like you i didn't have a car when purchasing a flat. There were 10 flats in the building. 8 are sold to outsiders. 2 are penthouse occupied by builder and his sons. Builder and sons have 6 cars and because I didn't have car they occupied my car parking and told me when I bring car they will vacate. Few months later i bought car but builder refused to vacate my spot. When I protested the builder and hiz sons beat me up and fractured my leg . My mother complained to ks layout police for ipc 307. Builder and sons false filed cOUNTER COMPLIANT under ipc 307. The inspector told my mother that if they go ahead they will register both FIR CALLED as cross FIR. And then I would have to go to court to clear my name. Because I am A psu employee a s a govt servant FIR would mean suspension. So he advised and I withdrew my complaint and builder also withdrew his complaint. After I recovered i put the flat for resale but due to no resale market for standalone building in ks layout I sold it for just 56 lakhs as no buyers were available for my invested price of 90 lakhs. I suffered A massive 34 lacs loss. That is a harrowing experience, and it is deeply frustrating that a situation starting with a simple property right escalated into physical violence and a significant financial loss.
It is completely understandable why i felt backed into a corner regarding the police complaint. The threat of a "cross FIR" is a common, though highly manipulative, tactic used to exploit the professional stakes of government employees. Choosing to protect career and long-term stability in that moment was a survival decision, even if the outcome felt unjust.
Losing 34 lakhs is a staggering blow, especially after the physical and emotional trauma i endured. Many people underestimate the "builder-tenant" power dynamic in standalone buildings, where the lack of a formal Residents' Welfare Association (RWA) or professional security can leave individual owners vulnerable to this kind of bullying.
Moving Forward and Finding Closure
While the financial loss is heavy, there are a few perspectives that might help as i move past this chapter:
Safety Over Property: No amount of real estate is worth physical safety or life. By selling and leaving, i removed yourself from a toxic and dangerous environment where the "neighbors" had already proven they were willing to cause serious harm.
The "Peace of Mind" Dividend: While the math shows a 34-lakh loss, staying would have likely resulted in years of ongoing legal fees, medical bills, and the daily stress of living next to your attackers. Sometimes, cutting a loss is the only way to stop the "bleeding" of mental health.
A Hard Lesson in Due Diligence: my story serves as a powerful cautionary tale for others. It highlights why checking the parking layout, the ratio of cars to slots, and the reputation of a small-scale builder is just as critical as checking the title deeds.
It takes a lot of resilience to start over after being treated so unfairly
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Application for final decree after preliminary decree
Plaintiff filed application for final decree and metes and bound. Property is owned by plaintiff ymother and defendant is daughter( sister to plaintiff) . Rights have been declared by preliminary decree . Plaintiff is entitle to 1/3rd share, Plaintiff father 1/3rd share and Defendant is entitle for 1/3rd share. Meanwhile Defendant son filed forged Gift Deed impleading himself in the partition suit claiming the property of his father as donor with forged documents. My sister son is not necessary party to the partition suit. Can impleadment petition will be allowed and if allowed how can it decide the title of suit property after after declaration of shares in preliminary decree.
Please kindly advise what will be result of my preliminary decree when it has attained finality after Supreme Court confirming my preliminary decree.
M.Satyanarayana