Balaji Bakthavathsal
02 August 2020 at 08:49
Dear Learned Lawyers,
I have a small doubt regarding cancellation of legal heir certificate obtained fraudulently. Some say that the court is the authority to cancel the legal heir certificate obtained fraudulently and some others say that the Higher official of the Revenue Department can cancel the fraudulent legal heir certificate. The rules and regulations change slightly from state to state. Can any one clarify who is he competent authority to cancel the legal heir certificate issued by the Thasildar of the Revenue Department in TAMIL NADU ? Can the Revenue Divisional Officer or Sub-Collector cancel the fraudulent legal heir certificate or only the court has the authority to do so ? If there is any citation, please share the same.
Thanking you,
B.Balaji
HC Pradyumna Rao
01 August 2020 at 23:22
KSLU is said to be recognized by BCI and UGC as well as it is established by Karnataka Govt. During the present Covid-19 situation the State Govt has ordered for cancellation of examinations whereas the BCI has issued guidelines for conducting examinations. So which is the ruling body for the KSLU. BCI ?? Karnataka Govt ??
Anonymous
01 August 2020 at 14:53
About me I am Sangeetha, Age -22 ,B.Sc graduate and I wish to ask some clarification on proprty rights.
I am only daughter for my mother (Aged-50-Divorce). My mother got divorce from my father after 17 years
(Marital life is only 2 years only for them) During the year of divorce got, I was 15 years old and at that time
one time settelment was made by father for the lumsum amount decided in the lok adalat court by giving 2 DDs
one for my mother and another one for me. Against this settelment only he got divorce from my mother .From my
childhood,I am always with my mother and still living with her and I am also unmarried. She is working in private firm
with less salary.I never saw him from my childhood to till date.He was govt rtd clerk. After getting divorce, my father
is not getting 2nd marriage and expired at the age of 60 recently.In this situation I wish to clarify some doubt on the property issues.
Properity-1 A residential house is there in my grand mother name (Father's mother ) and she is not alive.
Properity-2 A residential house is there in my father's name .
Will for property -1 is there, accordingly it will go to my father's younger sister.
Will for property -2 is there, accordingly it will go to my father's younger brother.
Shall I claim my father's share of property in the above two properties.If yes, in what way can I claim.
Yours faithfully,
Sangeetha.K
Ra Ma
01 August 2020 at 13:57
1) I have a 1/5 th share of a joint plot (ancestral property) in Chennai. Can I sell my share to a third party without NOC from the other co-owners? All the co-owners are family members.
2) Will the result be any different if the above-mentioned property is not an ancestral one, but jointly bought by all the family members
Anonymous
01 August 2020 at 11:31
I was working with a public limited co. as Legal Manager. Now I have retired. During my tenure in the co. I was a complainant in a cr. case which is still going on. After retirement I got enrolled as an advocate with BC of Delhi. After one month of my enrollment Co. CFO contacted me and told me to continue as complainant as I am the only person who knows all the facts of the case. My query is whether I can continue as a complainant after enrollment as an advocate. If yes, what should be my agreement with the co. now. Should I inform BC also before appearing in the court.
Rajkumar Gutti
01 August 2020 at 11:04
There are two service provider 1) ABC , 2) XYZ They are providing following service.
ABC- Goods transport service -Invoice amount- Rs.25000
XYZ- cargo container handling service - Invoice amount
My question is above two ABC & XYZ services are attract RCM GST or only
ABC service attract RCM GST.
Please guide me.
Anonymous
01 August 2020 at 07:20
I am a westbengal govt primary school teacher. I want to do higher study in distance mode with out hamper my job can i got the permission?
Anonymous
31 July 2020 at 15:52
Sir/madam,
Please guide me...
I want to file a special leave petition criminal in the supreme court against the order passed by the high court allahabad under section 125 cr. P.c. my lawyer at the high court made the state of U.P. a party to the case. So would i also have to make the State of U.P. a party in the SLP and how would it be mentioned in the cause title of SLP.
1. State of U.P.
Through...?
Please advise
Regards...
Udit
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Preponderance of probability of electronic evidence
Whether in a disciplinary proceeding an electronic evidence of the prosecution without any certificate u/s 65 B of the Evidence Act or the original instrument from where it was copied can be relied as a proof of misconduct of employee under the doctrine of the preponderance of probability? If not so then what are the parameters to prove the electronic evidence in a disciplinary proceeding. I am finding no judgment on the admissibility of the electronic evidence in a disciplinary proceeding on the basis of the preponderance of the probability. Experts to kindly resolve the problem based on settled laws.