138 ni act

Querist : Anonymous (Querist) 12 August 2026 This query is : Resolved
I supplied building material of rs 500000.00 to a person whom I know by name jaman singh and Bill also on name of Jaman singh.
He gave cheque which bear signature but not by name and which bounce and than notice in name of Jaman singh which he returned and than case of 138 ni act.
During trial i came to know that his name is jamanpreet singh.
Now at this stage my cross is over.
Will it spoil my whole case
Pls guide
Thanks.

Follow Query

Report Abuse

Quick Summary

A supplier issued building materials worth £500,000 to Jaman Singh, receiving a cheque in his name. The cheque bounced, and a legal notice was sent to Jaman Singh. During the trial for a 138 NI Act case, it was discovered the individual's full name is Jamanpreet Singh. The supplier is concerned this name discrepancy might jeopardise the case after their cross-examination is complete.

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Expert) 14 August 2026
If the accused admits his signature in the cheque then there is no problem to successfully prosecute him.

Dr. J C Vashista (Expert) 15 August 2026
What is the opinion and advise of the lawyer engaged / paid by you to proceed in the pending case u/s 138 of the NI Act, 1881 since s/he is well aware about facts of the case besides the facts that s/he is an intelligent, able, competent enough and duty bound to satisfy your questions?
or
You have lost faith in your lawyer and seeking second opinion and obligation of experts on this platform on the basis of limited information provided in your post? If so, replace him/her immediately.

Previous

Next

You need to be the querist or approved LAWyersclub expert to take part in this query .

Click here to login now

Similar Resolved Queries :

Ask Query
Unanswered Queries