Anonymous
05 January 2021 at 23:32
A sale deed of 1983, in which a mother signed in favour of her minor son and the land was sold without any prior permission of Court. Two other major brothers of the minor and the mother herself was other vendors of the land. Minor is now of 42 years. I was then the vendee and also present owner of the land. Now I wish to sell this residential land. But people don't agree to buy this as they think the deed is not valid and the minor can repudiate it. Is it true? I've also convinced them the minor is now major and demanded a value lower than the current market value. Please suggest me what should I do?
Anonymous
05 January 2021 at 22:58
Can 'Salami' or 'Pagdi' from a new tenant be taken in Bank draft / Bankers cheque; where the landlord is not transferring the right of ownership of the flat to the new tenant. The tenant would be taking the possession of the flat on low monthly rental basis. The jurisdiction is Kolkata.
Anonymous
05 January 2021 at 21:29
Good evening everyone..
I have been facing a false rape and dowry case due to a matrimonial dispute. I am on court bail. Always abided the bail conditions.
Now the problem is that the person who has put allegations on me is sending complaint letters to politicians, Govt bodies and even in my department stating highly objectionable content and allegations. She has even sent copy of FIR and statement under 164 crpc without even masking /hiding the identity.
My questions:
1. Can she post such letters wherein FIR and 164 crpc statement be attached?
2. Can I take any action like criminal defamation as her letters are really damaging my already deplorable image?
3. Any remedies in above situation!!!!
Kindly reply , each and every word counts a lot to me.
Anonymous
05 January 2021 at 16:58
Our tenants built a cement water tank in our premise land 27 years back and we let it be
Can v remove it
Anonymous
05 January 2021 at 14:06
SIR
SHARES IN ANCESTRAL PROPERTY CAN BE WAIVED OR WITHDRAW BY WAY OF GIVING NOTICE IN LOCAL NEWS PAPER THROUGH LAWER. ITS VALID ?
Gayatri Gaitonde
05 January 2021 at 05:06
We have tenants since 1940
They built a cement water tank of 1000 litres in our garden 20 years back
Also mounted 1000 litre tank on terrace
Can we remove their water connection from tank built in garden as they didn't take permission
Also tank on terrace as it's causing load to old building
They're only 4 people staying in our 1500 sq feet area at andheri east for rent of 100
ks
04 January 2021 at 21:43
Dear Experts,
In my family right now I have my mother and my sister living abroad. Can I create HUF between three of us ? (At present there is no HUF inherited from my father.)
Bhagwan sahay
04 January 2021 at 20:29
complainant wrote on paper in challan that is i hand over pen drive to i.o. which containing recording ( footage ) of cctv installed in my shop
is this only sufficient in 65b certificate ?
is it admissible in court of law or not ?
can this will correct after objection ? in court if object by defense lawyer ?
Surya Prakash
04 January 2021 at 19:33
Sir,
I am an central government employee . I can be a member of Society registered under Society registration act 1860.
© 2026 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Suit under article 64
In suit under article 64, it is settled law that plaintiff only needs to prove possession and title need not be proved unless Defendant can proved one.
But if plaintiff fails to show his title but proved his previous possession and Defendant who is in possession fails to prove his title but proved that title belongs to third person through whom he has come in to possession then what will happen?
Whether plaintiff will get possession or Defendant will retain the possession?
Advice given by one of the lawyer is that possession is nine tenth of law and hence plaintiff suit will be dismissed but I do not agree because plaintiff is dispossessed illegally when plaintiff was in settle possession.
Any decision of court like Nair Service Society on the above will be helpful. Decision of Nair service society only rules that plaintiff can get back possession if Defendant cannot proved title but does not says that what will happen in above case if title of third party is proved by Defendant.
Thank you.