As the rates quoted by me were the lowest,the Tender was awarded to me. A formal letter was sent to me on 30.2.95 to informing that my tender has been accepted and that i have to required to deposit a bank guarantee for Rs, 10,00000/- within 45 days from date of letter. This letter failed to reach me, company meanwhile after waiting the prescribed 45 days deided to start legal proceedings and filed a suit of breach of contract. What should i do? Is the company has a power to do so aginst me ? Which section is in my favour which against?
Sir,
a landlord file a case against tenant for evection of shop for his son's resonable and bonafied necesity for transport business but did not present him as a witness.
so that my Question is this..
kya tenant is ground par safal hoga..ki landlord ki necessity resonable nahi hai.. if there any citation is available in this regard plz suggest me
I AM HAVING SELF ACQUIRED PROPERTY ALONG WITH THE PROPERTIES BEQUETHED BY MY FATHER AND PROPERTIES BY PARTITION OF PROPERTIES OF MY MOTHER.
CAN I WRITE A WILL BEQUETHING ALL THESE PROPERTEIS TO MY WIFE . I AM THE FATHER OF THREE DAUGHTERS.
KINDLY ADVISE.
Sir,
Is there any Limitation Act - Time Limit for giving a will for probate ? My lawyer says that a will can be given for probate only within 3 years from the death of the drawer of the will. Can you pls. give me the Act No.
Thanks Kalyani
Respected All,
My query is based on Three Points, Please advise-
1. I entered into a unregistered lease agreement and that agreement came to an end on Dec31 2008. But there was a clause" that lease deed shall be renewed if lessee desires, on mutually agreed term.
2.I want to file a suit praying the court to direct the lessor under specific performance Act.
3. Can unregistered lease deed be admitted as an evidence.
Pls provide any supreme court decision
covering all three points.
Waiting for your reply. its urgent.
Regards,
Confusion over conclusive proof.
Hello! Respected Members of the Forum
Wud u please make me enlighten on this issue?. Why L.C (School Leaving Certificate) can not be called as a conclusive proof in a minor girl rape case? Please explain it exclusively as I found Hon’ble Judge’s explanation as well as Ld advocates arguments are not satisfactory to me in the Court proceedings.
V.G.Rao Advocate
14 February 2009 at 11:55
Hi all,
I am a complainant side advocate in 138 NI act case filed by me, I have examined complainant as pw-1, and subsequently he was cross examined by counsel for accused,now the matter is coming up for complainants side further evidence, while matter stood thus, the complainant died leaving behind his wife and two children who are still minors, now my question is whether his legal heirs can continue his case filed under sec 138 NI act, if yes under what provision of law i can seek leave of the court to bring LR's of complainants side on record, provide me information citing any case laws in support of my case.
Kishor Satwick
14 February 2009 at 10:24
The family consists of Father, Mother, two sons and one daughter. Father along with his brothers and mother held joint property. The said property was self-acquired property of his father, i.e. grand father. The property consisted of land and chawl full of tenants. The property was sold to developer who as a consideration allotted flat to Sons. The Father in question has three major children. One of the children is demanding 1/3rd share in the flat. The questions are - 1)Whether the flat so aqcuired by Father will constitute inherited property or the flat is his self-acquired property and he can deal with the same as per his free will? 2) Can his son demand share in the said flat? 3) When the development agreement was signed with the builder, Father was the class 1 heir. The son is class 2 heir. When the class 1 heirs are alive, how can the class 2 heirs demand share in the property?
defamation
atul runs a firm having c&f of many companies & his father is a govt. servant getting a scale of 1st class. according to ledger of atul. mr.rajeev has to pay rs.2 lacs to atul according to ledger balance of mr.rajeev. after some time rajeev gave two cheques of rs.10,000/-to atul & fraudulently give a notice through his advocate making party to atul's father & second party to his atul's firm that you have not supplied me goods for which i have given u two cheques for rs.10,000/- each hence committed offence u/s 406 & 420.
here i want to ask this that can atul's father suit case of defamation on mr.rajeev? as atul's father is a govt servant & has no concern with business & what atul can do, because the cheques given in favour of atul's firm was in account of previous balance of mr.rajeev