vinod bansal
21 March 2009 at 17:27
Sir
my house was got damaged due to breakage of a drain situated in front of my house (in public street)due to this breakage water entered & collected in my house resultly it got damaged my house badly.for filing suit for damages against govt. as the drain is operated & built by water supply deptt. Haryana what procedure & provision will apply.plz help
prateek saxena
21 March 2009 at 15:58
dear sir,
pls tell me why we make any rental agreement for 11 months in usual practise. is there any law rearding this.
pls advice me.
DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g
21 March 2009 at 15:42
There is no specific provision for recall of process in a criminal case by the same Court which has issued it.
What is the procedure for recall / cancellation of process once issued and what is the latest case law in the matter.
Bharat Gala
21 March 2009 at 10:55
I shall be obliged if my following queries are solved.
1) Whether consumer can file a complaint in the Consumer dispute redressal forum without giving written complaint to the seller ?
2) Is complaint sent by e-mail to the manufacturer directly be treated as intimation to the seller even though the seller in not informed in writing or verbally?
3) Can manufacturer be a party in the complaint by the consumer who has no direct dealing ? Is he a consumer of a manufacturer as per the defination given in the Act even though there is no transection or contract of service with him?
Pls. advice.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Vikas Kr. Sinha
21 March 2009 at 08:24
Hi friends,
I am in need of Orissa Trade Union Rules, 1994. (Rule-24) for the purpose of Argument in a case regarding status of recognised and non-recognised Union.
Thnx.
Vikas
GOPAL
21 March 2009 at 01:15
is that advisable to add mis. receipts in the return of income to increase the income of an individual who has a income from salary or business. In which case IT departement can consider the Mis Receipts as casual income which is taxable @ 30%.
N.K.Assumi
20 March 2009 at 22:09
Is it competent for the Family Courts constituted under the Family Courts Act of 1984 to solemnized marriage like Court marriage?
Y V Vishweshwar Rao
20 March 2009 at 18:37
Land Boundaries Discrepancy ;-
A Person - X purchased 1-00 acres land with the boundaries as per the Sale document ;-
Wrong mentioned
Boundaries as per doct. Site Boundaries;
East;- Land of A East:- Land of D
West:_ land of B West:- Land of C
North:- land of C North:- land of B
South Land of D South;- land of A
X is in possession since more than 28 years -from the date of purchase
In fact the land purchased by X is with in the in the same boundaries ,
but the East, West, North & South Pole direction are incorrect on the actual
location and the same are the boundaries -
The Pole directions are only deferring on the site , there is no other change in the
boundaries and Land .The Land is situated in the same Sy number as mentioned
in the Document .
The Same boundaries mentioned in the sale document are either on one side or
the other side .
There was mistake while drafting the sale document- unregistered
by a Village person.
The there is no possibility to get another document from the Vendor,
for the reason that after 28 years possession of X, the Vendor
is trying to deny the sale -
There is no other change in the land .
With the above Site Situation boundaries the Property is located /identified and
in possession of X since 28 years
The Third parties ( other than Vendor ) are trying to interfere with the rights & Possession of
the purchaser
I request the members to clarify on the following and inform ;-
1 Whether the purchaser can successfully maintain a suit for a decree of declaration of Title & Injunction with actual location boundaries against the third parties (not Vendor)
by pleading the mistake in the old unregistered document .
2 Any citations on this aspect my be mentioned
3 I request the valuable suggestions on this issue
With advance thanks - Y V V Rao Advocate
Y V Vishweshwar Rao
20 March 2009 at 18:33
Land Boundaries Discrepancy ;-
A Person - X purchased 1-00 acres land with the boundaries as per the Sale document ;-
Wrong mentioned Correct actual
Boundaries as per doct. Boundaries;- Site Situation
East;- Land of A East:- Land of D
West:_ land of B West:- Land of C
North:- land of C North:- land of B
South Land of D South;- land of A
X is in possession since more than 28 years -from the date of purchase
In fact the land purchased by X is with in the in the same boundaries ,
but the East, West, North & South Pole direction are incorrect on the actual
location and the same are the boundaries -
The Pole directions are only deferring on the site , there is no other change in the
boundaries and Land .The Land is situated in the same Sy number as mentioned
in the Document .
The Same boundaries mentioned in the sale document are either on one side or
the other side .
There was mistake while drafting the sale document- unregistered
by a Village person.
The there is no possibility to get another document from the Vendor,
for the reason that after 28 years possession of X, the Vendor
is trying to deny the sale -
There is no other change in the land .
With the above Site Situation boundaries the Property is located /identified and
in possession of X since 28 years
The Third parties ( other than Vendor ) are trying to interfere with the rights & Possession of
the purchaser
I request the members to clarify on the following and inform ;-
1 Whether the purchaser can successfully maintain a suit for a decree of declaration of Title & Injunction with actual location boundaries against the third parties (not Vendor)
by pleading the mistake in the old unregistered document .
2 Any citations on this aspect my be mentioned
3 I request the valuable suggestions on this issue
With advance thanks - Y V V Rao Advocate
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
suit for issuence direction to concerned public authorities
Sir
I want to issuance directions to public authorities as RTA/SDM for complaince of MoTOR VEHICLE ACT & THEIR STATURY DUTIES AS THERE IS A GROSS VIOLATION OF THE MV ACT BY FILING A SUIT IN DISTT. CIVIL COURT..PLZ HELP