attachment before judgment

hello,sir
i want to ask that, when can a court pass an order of attachment before judgment?
i gone through order38, rule5 but consept is not clera yet.is it a discretionary or mendetory?
thanks!

attachment before judgment

hello,sir
i want to ask that, when can a court pass an order of attachment before judgment?
i gone through order38, rule5 but consept is not clera yet.is it a discretionary or mendetory?
thanks!

Hindu Sucession Act 1956

-Landed property originally owned by Bhau Khot as ancestral property
-Bhau khot executed two lands to his sister (Tanabai Balu Yadav)to his sister for her maintainence till her life time and after her demised the said property should be come to Bhau Khot accordingly registered maintainence deed was executed the contents of the deed are binding upon the heirs. In 1964 Bhau Khot died and Tanabai died in the year 1971.
-Whether the property given in maintaince is became the absolute property of Tanabai after the death of Bhau Khot?
OR
-Whether the property given in maintaince is became ancestral property of Bhau Khot and it should be devolved in the heirs of Bhau Khot and after his demise son namely Dinkar Khot can become the absolute owner or he can possessed property as self acquired or ancestral. What is the correct nature or status of the property after the death of Tanabai in the heirs of Bhau His son Dinkar and his sons and daughters?
-What will be the share of Dinkar’s two sons,wife and two daughters those who r married before 1994?

CONTRACT LABOUR REGULATION & ABOLITION ACT, 1970

Please refer to the definition of "Appropriate Government " under CLR&A Act 1970.
Can any of the learned lawyer throw some light regrding who would be the "Appropriate Government" under CLR&A Act for Central Public Sector Undertakings, i.e Central govt. or state govt.References in this regard may be made to the Judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in SAIL and HAL cases.
It is pertinent to mention that in the State of Chhattisgarh, CG IR Act is applicable in palce of ID Act.

hindu sucession act 1956

-Landed property originally owned by Bhau Khot.
-Bhau khot executed two lands to his sister (Tanabai Balu Yadav)to his sister for her maintainnce till her life time.
-she died the without any heirs.
As per died the property should come to Bhau Khot.
-Bhau khot died in 1964 and Tanabai 1974.
-Bhau khot has one son Dinakar and two sister who were married before 1964.After that the property sale out by the elder brother mansingh for the reason of By-pass surgery of Father.
-They have right to sell out the property of restraining the right of Jaysingh?
-Son Of Dinkar Jaysingh has filed suit for Partition and claimed 1/4 share.
-Dinkar climed the property of Tanabai as heir of Bhau as full owner and denied the share of Jaysingh in the property of Dinkar as Coparcener.
-Whether the property given in maintainnce become the property of Dinkar on full owner and not partible.
-I have filed suit on behalf of the Jaysingh son of Dinkar for partition against father and brother.
-What will be the share of Jaysingh?

Definition of Terrorist:

WHO IS A TERRORIST? IS THERE ANY DEFINITION OF TERRORIST UNDER ANY INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS LIKE THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS OR THE ROME STATUE? WHAT ABOUT THE UNITED NATIONS? HAS IT DEFINED THE MEANING OF TERRORIST?

Will i have register my grand father property on my name

sec.91and 397 cr.p.c.

under sec.91 order by magistrate is interlocutory or not!

Negotiable Instruments Act

Dear All

The facts of the case are as under. I am for the accused. The accused and the complainants are family friends for over 3 decades. The complainant had sold a property to the accused and executed a registered sale deed. As a part of the sale consideration the accused has issued a Cheque for Rs 65000/- and mentioned clearly in the sale deed. The accused maintained sufficient balance into his bank account as on the date of issue of the Cheque. Immediately the next day after the sale transaction the accused went to the property and found that there are third party claimants on this property and well as that of Governments claim on this property and civil litigations were there much before the sale transaction took place. The District Collector, Thasildhar and other Government Officials have imposed ban on the sale of this property much before the sale transaction took place. But the complainant purchased the property with different survey numbers and after coming to know the problems he has cleverly sold the property to the accused who is his friend. By then the accused has paid huge amount to the complainant except the mentioned Cheque amount. The accused has informed not to present the Cheque. The complainant has assured to solve the problems and has done nothing and presented the for collection as the time of the Cheque was getting lapsed at the end of 6 months. The Cheque bounced. Cheque bounce case and a civil case for cancellation of the sale deed was filed by the complainant.. After some time the Complainant got amended the civil case for recovery of the balance sale consideration in the event of the sale deed cannot be cancelled. The Civil case was won by us and pending at the High Court

The Accused got the land survey done by the Thasildar office to prove that the survey numbers mentioned are wrong and also procured more than 30 documents to prove the land has several claims and Govt. Claims. The Concerned Deputy Collector was summoned to the court by the accused and he has clearly stated in his chief and Cross examination that the property belongs to the Government.

The complainant has filed only a certified copy of the Cheque in the Criminal Court.

I request members to provide and useful information and High court or S.C. judgments favorable to the accused.

Thank you

MOBILE TOWER

SIR, SUCH A CASE IN INDIA THAT THE PUBLIC STOPPED THE MOBILE TOWER INSTALLATION. TECHNICAL PROBLEMS,EXPLANATIONS REG.. MOBILE TOWER INSTALLATION IN RESIDENTIAL AREA.WHICH MAY ARISE BY THE NEIGHBOUR RESIDENTS,KINDLY SOLVE.TH...U..