Rahul Deshpande
08 January 2010 at 00:44
My client has been registered under a criminal case & charged by police constable under IPC section 34,353 in year 1998. The case has come up for evidance now. The charges have been framed. Like to know whether judge can discharge him under following circumstances:
1. Incase prosecution witness deny that they do not remember the event.
2. Incase prosecution witness does not turn up or police constable does not turn up
3. Incase police constable did not to attch duty report or attendance to prove he was on duty at the time of event to the chargesheet
4.If not under above; any other things which you can suggest which can go favourable for him.
Furhter ,like to know the case judgements that will be helpful in this case with a general opinion in regard to judgements in IPC353 cases
What would be the circumstances in which he can be acquited keeping in view the fact that case is around 12 yrs old & burden of proof is on state.
Thanks
Saket
Anonymous
08 January 2010 at 00:18
Respected Experts,
We 5 brothers and sisters are having a house in chattisgarh state and are in possession of the house.
The house's market value is 5 crore rupees , however going by the collector guidelines it is 1.5 crore rs.. I want to bring a suit for partition ,kindly guide me how much court fees or duty need i deposit to bring the suit .
thanks in advance......
Narasinha Kamat
08 January 2010 at 00:12
We are coming up with a hotel project in Sindhudurg, Maharashtra. We require consultants to carry out the conversion of agricultural land to N.A. please contact me on 9923910205 urgently
pulkit agarwal
07 January 2010 at 23:34
I wanted to ask whether governor has any discretionary power in case of a matter relating to granting of sanction to prosecute a minister?
i wanted to know that. if for example there is prosecution of any minister on charges of corruption by CBI and CBI asks for sanction to prosecute that minister from the Governor under Section 197 of Cr.P.C.. So i wanted to know that whether in such matter the Governor has to follow the aid and advise of Council of Ministers or act on his own discretion and grant the sanction to CBI?
Anonymous
07 January 2010 at 23:25
Dear sir/madam
A registerd partnership firm was having 4 partners A B C D..in 2004 partners C & D signed a document retiring them from the partnership.
how ever the date was not put upon the retirement deed and partners C & D continued as the partners of the firm upto 2009..now C & D want to continue as partners of the firm...A & B put the date of 2009 on the retirement deed and want to retire them.
Can partners C & D challenge the validity of the document as it was signed in year 2004 and the date was put on year 2009 .
Ques1 Is the retirement deed invalid?
Ques2 Will the presenting of such a deed fall under fraud or forgery?
abdulrahaman
07 January 2010 at 23:25
Dear sir ,
let me know the best tax planning for the following assesse.
1) The person is a doctor running a private clinic.In this condition which is the best method of tax planning mention below, if this person consists of wife (educated house wife),two minor chilren,father and mother.
a) A partnership firm of husband,wife,father and mother.
b) a private trust
c) any other tax planning
abdulrahaman
07 January 2010 at 23:17
Dear sir ,
kindly clarify by givingcase law.
1) If a complainant by keeping his own employee as main Accused filed a criminal case aganst other employee and third parties for the breach of trust and non execution of contract ,cheating,etc to the extent of 2 crores .The main accused was working with the employer even after filing criminal case until the other persons were arrested.
How far this case is valid in the eyes of law?
Anonymous
07 January 2010 at 22:54
IN CASE OF DEATH OF A DMAT A/C HOLDER,WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE OF TRANSFER OF SHARES THE VALUE OF THE SHARES EXCEEDS ONE LACS AND THE NOMINEE IS NOT REGISTERED?WHAT IS THE ROLE OF REGISTERED WILL IN THIS CASE WHEN SHARES CERTIFICATES MENTIONED IN THE WILL?
State 'x'has ratified international covenent on civil and political rights, imposed death penalty upon a pregnant woman,who was guilty of murdering the prime minstes of state x,decide
related to my previous query.whether PIL maintainable or no
R/seniors,
Related to my yestarday"s query regarding PIL.That i already filed an application to seek information under R.T.I related to the employees and officers of Railways , who r persuing full time L.LB courses without the permission from their employers from The colleges/University.The college/university failed to furnish the same and in some cases they furnished the copy of permission that too for only one session.The Hon"b C.I.C issued show cause and further directed to furnish the copy of permission,their attendence status and the action initiated against them,whereas on other hand the G.M of the Railway refused any action against all those students because as per the office record they all had performed their duties regularly and further suggested me to approach the compentent authority regarding their simultanous attendence in law colleges to initiate action against them.Under such conditions whether the P.I.L is maintainable or not?