Shree.
20 March 2008 at 18:34
Wheather police can arrest an person before surrendering him before the magistrate in the court premises or when the police finds the accused along with the advocate?
Is there any rules or laws regarding this problem?
Dimple
20 March 2008 at 14:05
Hello All,
I'm a divorcee women mother of a 9 yr old girl child (custd. is her father). I'm working with a small Pvt. firm from last 3-4 yrs.
November 2005 I met a men who is younger then me. He propose to marry me after knowing everything about me. He promise to marry me, as soon as his parents come to our place & bless us. But his parents are not accepting me due to my past. He tie mangalsutra on my neck & promise me again for legal registry by December 2006. We started to live together from June 2006. He told our neighbors that we are husband & wife. But his office colleagues know that we are friends. In August 2006 I got pregnant with his child & September 2006 aborted the baby because he was not ready for kids at that time. In hospitals records & MTP consent letter he sign as HUSBAND with his full name, address and mob.no.
10th January 2008 he told me that his father & brother are very seriously injured & admitted in Punjab (his native place). Next day (11th Jan.08) he leave for his gaon.
2 days after I came to know that he cheated me, he got married on 18th Jan08
I want justice, after requesting so many times, he couldn’t register our marriage intentionally. Pl help me, I’m not capable to spend so much money for legal advice. But I want to show his asli chehra to everybody.
ashok jain
19 March 2008 at 10:59
A public servant files a criminal complaint in his official capacity. On his transfer, can his successor become the complainant.
Member (Account Deleted)
19 March 2008 at 08:07
Hi everyone,
I want to know which Sections (or Chapters) of the CrPC and Indian Evidence Act should one know by heart before joining the bar as a criminal lawyer?
Nijaguna Murthy G
15 March 2008 at 19:13
Sir,
The facts of the case are as under:
Two Deputy Directors (having the same name but initials differs) of a State Govt. Department are working at Two different places in the State. Details are: Their names are A. Ramanna & B. Ramanna respectively.
I- A. RAMANNA’S PARTICULARS:-
1)Name : -A. RAMANNA
2)Present Desgn: -Dy. Director
3)Present Place of working: -Bangalore
4)Year of joining into Service: -1992
5)Promoted as Supdt : -1998
6)Promoted as Asst. Director: -2003
7)Promoted & Presently working as DD at-Bangalore since 2007
II- B. RAMANNA’S PARTICULARS:-
1)Name : -B. RAMANNA
2)Present Desgn: -Dy. Director
3)Present Place of working: -Gulburga
4)Year of joining into Service: -1996
5)Promoted as Supdt : -1999
6)Promoted as Asst. Director: -2004
7)Promoted & Presently working as DD at-Gulburga since 2007
Both A. Ramanna & B. Ramanna were under the scanner of Lokayukta of the State since 2 to 3 months on suspession of possessig assets disprotionate to known source of income.
On a targetted day the Lokayukta Staff conducts raid on the house belonging to B. Ramanna at Bangalore and finds assets disproportionate to B. Ramanna's actual income.The name & initial of B. Ramanna & the address of his Residential House at Bangalore & details of other properties he owns at various localities of Bangalore are properly mentioned in the Source Information Report & FIR.Residential address in the Search warrant of B. Ramanna, DD, is also correctly recorded.
However office he is presently holding is recorded as "Presently working as DD,Bangalore" instead of DD, Gulburga, both in the Source Report & FIR.(Repeatedly mentioned as such for 6 times in the Source Report & FIR).
Further, the search warant(issued by JMFC, Special Court of Bangalore City)in respect of the office of DD is issued says "B. Ramanna, DD, Bangalore" instead of Gulburga. Further there was no search warrant issued against his office at Gulburga. Lokayukta, after learning the fact during the time of raiding his house at Bangalore realizes that his office is at Gulburga & not at Bangalore & hence returns without raiding the DD office, at Bangalore.The case is under investigation by a Dy.SP of Lokayukta, since 3 months.
Now the queries are:
A)Can B. Ramanna file a petition in the High Court of the State seeking squashing of FIR & further proceedings of Lokayukta, on the ground of MISTAKEN IDENTITY & DENIAL OF NATURE JUSTICE? If so, under what Sec. & Acts?? Are there any decided court Judgements of similar case?? (Pl. furnish details)
B)If the judgement is in favour of B. Ramanna, is there any possibility of Lokayukta to file a fresh FIR and conduct/continue proceedings and prosecute B. Ramanna?
C)Can B. Ramanna plead in the court to prove that it is a case of mistaken identity & instead of proceeding against A. Ramanna, Lokayukta have inadvertantly proceeded against him. Can B. Ramanna produce all the relevant documentary evidences which also clearly establishes that even A. Ramanna is also having Disproportionate Assets than his known source of Income & quntum of Assets of A. Ramanna are more than that B. Ramanna??
Since the issue is sensetive, can any body respond early Pl...???
G.N. Murthy.
syedamzadpasha
14 March 2008 at 18:10
sir
My friend working in central governement job and he get married to the lady she belongs to Maharastra and he belongs to Andhra Pradesh. His Brother-in-law(wifes brother) get married and his wife kept 498(a) for all entire family members in nasik police station and my friend and his wife not implicated in the offence and they are falsely implicated. my friend leading marital life happily in andhra pradesh. if any possibility is there to approach the case hereself(in andhra Pradesh)
syedamzadpasha
14 March 2008 at 17:55
sir
My friend belongs to andhra pradesh and he is working in central govt.job and he got marrited a lady belongs to maharastra and he comes to his place and continuing his job and both are leading marital life happily and his brother-in-law(wifes brother) got married. the wife of brother-in-law kept the case of 498(a) at Nasic (maharastra) for all the family members and my friends contention is that if any possibility is there from andhra pradesh to release from the 498(a). Please intitmate me as soon as possible
R Murali
14 March 2008 at 13:35
"X" filed a complaint before the Metropolitan Magistrate for an offence under Sec. 138 of NI Act against "Y" a limited company & its directors "A" & "B". In the complaint, it was alleged by "X" that a cheque for Rs. 10 lacs was issued on behalf of accused company for the debts due to the complainant & said cheque was dishonoured on the ground of insufficency of funds and statutory notice was issued to the accused company as well as to the directors but no amount was paid. The Magistrate took cognizance against the company & its directors. The accused company raised objections that winding up proceedings have been order by the company court and hence no prosecution could be co0ntinued against the company. The magistrate dropped the proceedings against the company but proceeded against the directors. The directors filed an application for dropping of proceedings against them on the ground that the complaint was not maintainable without prosecuting the company. The magistrate dismissed this application, Challenging the order, the directors filed revision before the session court.
How to prepare a memorial offer on behalf the complainant company or Director to argue the case
harish
14 March 2008 at 10:30
Hello,
I am harish. i want to know about the format for legal drafting in criminal & civil cases.
Also help me about how to write a police complaint letter.
regards
Harish
Member Strength 9,48,067 and growing..
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
evidence act
Hi.all
I want to know what is the evidentiary value of voice recorder on mobile phone , when recorded while conversation going on from land line to mobile,and is it admissible in evidence, if yes can u provide me any case laws in such circumstances.